From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from devils.ext.ti.com (devils.ext.ti.com [198.47.26.153]) by arago-project.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEBBE529E2 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 17:46:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dflxv15.itg.ti.com ([128.247.5.124]) by devils.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u14HkNnv018433 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 11:46:23 -0600 Received: from DLEE70.ent.ti.com (dlemailx.itg.ti.com [157.170.170.113]) by dflxv15.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u14HkN7N032766 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 11:46:23 -0600 Received: from dflp32.itg.ti.com (10.64.6.15) by DLEE70.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.113) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.224.2; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 11:46:22 -0600 Received: from localhost (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dflp32.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u14HkM3o028621; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 11:46:23 -0600 Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 12:46:07 -0500 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: Jacob Stiffler Message-ID: <20160204174606.GJ31480@edge> References: <1454594668-2894-1-git-send-email-j-stiffler@ti.com> <20160204172753.GI31480@edge> <56B38B98.2020906@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56B38B98.2020906@ti.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: meta-arago@arago-project.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] packagegroup-arago-tisdk-addons: Add debug tools such as gdb X-BeenThere: meta-arago@arago-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Arago metadata layer for TI SDKs - OE-Core/Yocto compatible List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 17:46:24 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 12:34:16PM -0500, Jacob Stiffler wrote: > Can you point to where this is? I do not see any in the meta-arago > packagegroups, and it has been missing from our filesystem. images/tisdk-server-rootfs-image.bb packagegroups/packagegroup-arago-test-addons.bb Surprisingly, server-rootfs-image is the only consumer of the test-addons packagegroup... And adding gdb directly to a server image was a temp hack 3+ years ago - "nothing is more permanent than the temporary", eh? :) > On 2/4/2016 12:27 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > >I think there are already couple places where gdb is added directly. Can we > >clean those up as well? > > >