From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753223AbcBGBC3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Feb 2016 20:02:29 -0500 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:39582 "EHLO out4-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751392AbcBGBC2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Feb 2016 20:02:28 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: BqhOW2rLf6IXfC7n5l6K100SPCHJo5c43LI6esD4Zc/B 1454806947 Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2016 17:02:26 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Andrey Utkin Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "kernel-mentors@selenic.com" , Andrey Utkin Subject: Re: Email handling - please share what tools you use Message-ID: <20160207010226.GA28875@kroah.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 01:53:34AM +0200, Andrey Utkin wrote: > ==== BEGIN PERSONAL COMPLAINTS ===== Stop complaining and bend one of the existing tools to your will. I recommend configuring mutt to do what you want and take a week or two to learn how to use it well. Many distros provide "sane" defaults for the tool, and the configuration is very well documented. You will not regret it. If you don't like mutt, for your oddly-specific reasons, then use some other tool, it's not like we don't have a ton of different ones out there for email as you have documented so well already. good luck, greg k-h