* Infernalis RGW failure investigation
@ 2016-02-08 3:52 Loic Dachary
2016-02-08 21:02 ` Karol Mroz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Loic Dachary @ 2016-02-08 3:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ceph Development
Dear RGW developers,
We ran into http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14665 on the infernalis branch. It would be great if someone could shed some light on why it happens.
Cheers
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Infernalis RGW failure investigation
2016-02-08 3:52 Infernalis RGW failure investigation Loic Dachary
@ 2016-02-08 21:02 ` Karol Mroz
2016-02-09 5:34 ` Loic Dachary
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Karol Mroz @ 2016-02-08 21:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Loic Dachary; +Cc: Ceph Development
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 803 bytes --]
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:52:45AM +0700, Loic Dachary wrote:
> Dear RGW developers,
>
> We ran into http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14665 on the infernalis branch. It would be great if someone could shed some light on why it happens.
>
Hi Loic,
If this has already been discussed elsewhere, or I'm simply stating the obvious,
my apologies in advance. However, it looks like the rgw socket file _may_ be created
with some odd permissions/ownership, relative to the user under which the test is being
run.
With a recent ceph/master build on my end (I don't have immediate access to an infernalis
system), the rgw admin socket is created as ceph:ceph. Running `radosgw-admin` as root
then binds fine.
I've added http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14665#note-3
--
Regards,
Karol
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Infernalis RGW failure investigation
2016-02-08 21:02 ` Karol Mroz
@ 2016-02-09 5:34 ` Loic Dachary
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Loic Dachary @ 2016-02-09 5:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ceph Development
Hi,
On 09/02/2016 04:02, Karol Mroz wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:52:45AM +0700, Loic Dachary wrote:
>> Dear RGW developers,
>>
>> We ran into http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14665 on the infernalis branch. It would be great if someone could shed some light on why it happens.
>>
>
> Hi Loic,
>
> If this has already been discussed elsewhere, or I'm simply stating the obvious,
> my apologies in advance. However, it looks like the rgw socket file _may_ be created
> with some odd permissions/ownership, relative to the user under which the test is being
> run.
>
> With a recent ceph/master build on my end (I don't have immediate access to an infernalis
> system), the rgw admin socket is created as ceph:ceph. Running `radosgw-admin` as root
> then binds fine.
>
>
> I've added http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14665#note-3
Thanks ! let's continue this discussion in the tracker :-)
Cheers
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-02-09 5:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-02-08 3:52 Infernalis RGW failure investigation Loic Dachary
2016-02-08 21:02 ` Karol Mroz
2016-02-09 5:34 ` Loic Dachary
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.