From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932257AbcBHXUH (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 8 Feb 2016 18:20:07 -0500
Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:46591 "EHLO
	mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751691AbcBHXUF (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 8 Feb 2016 18:20:05 -0500
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 15:20:04 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
        Badhri Jagan Sridharan <Badhri@google.com>,
        Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>,
        Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@topic.nl>,
        Robert Baldyga <r.baldyga@samsung.com>,
        Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] usb: gadget: u_ether: Add workqueue as bottom half
 handler for rx data path
Message-ID: <20160208232004.GC19380@kroah.com>
References: <1454962276-6023-1-git-send-email-amit.pundir@linaro.org>
 <CAMi1Hd00EC3rjfkEsxxEaiWz4bzNiCM3Fa8t_PqF_czn7WAG4w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAMi1Hd00EC3rjfkEsxxEaiWz4bzNiCM3Fa8t_PqF_czn7WAG4w@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 02:07:02AM +0530, Amit Pundir wrote:
> Please ignore this one too. I should have build tested these patches
> individually and not in particular series. I'll resend this patch.

Send them in a numbered series so we know what order they have to be
applied in.

And I always ignore RFC patches, if you can't be confident enough in
submitting it for inclusion, why should we care?  :)

You have of course tested these, right?

thanks,

greg k-h