From: luca abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
To: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, wanpeng.li@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/deadline: add per rq tracking of admitted bandwidth
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 13:48:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160210134848.12e6a6f8@utopia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160210113258.GX11415@e106622-lin>
Hi,
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 11:32:58 +0000
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> wrote:
[...]
> From 62f70ca3051672dce209e8355cf5eddc9d825c2a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
> Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2016 12:41:09 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] sched/deadline: add per rq tracking of admitted
> bandwidth
>
> Currently SCHED_DEADLINE scheduling policy tracks bandwidth of tasks
> that passed admission control at root_domain level only. This creates
> problems when such data structure(s) are destroyed, when we
> reconfigure scheduling domains for example.
>
> This is part one of two changes required to fix the problem. In this
> patch we add per-rq tracking of admitted bandwidth. Tasks bring with
> them their bandwidth contribution when they enter the system and are
> enqueued for the first time. Contributions are then moved around when
> migrations happen and removed when tasks die.
I think this patch actually does two different things (addressing two
separate problems):
1) it introduces the tracking of per-rq utilization (used in your next
patch to address the root domain issues)
2) it fixes a bug in the current utilization tracking mechanism.
Currently, a task doing
while(1) {
switch to SCHED_DEADLINE
switch to SCHED_OTHER
}
brings dl_b->total_bw below 0. Thanks to Juri for showing me this
problem (and how to reproduce it) in a private email.
This happens because when the task switches back from SCHED_DEADLINE
to SCHED_OTHER, switched_from_dl() does not clear its deadline
parameters (they will be cleared by the deadline timer when it
fires). But dl_overflow() removes its utilization from
dl_b->total_bw. When the task switches back to SCHED_DEADLINE, the
if (new_bw == p->dl.dl_bw) check in dl_overflow() prevents
__dl_add() from being called, and so when the task switches back to
SCHED_OTHER dl_b->total_bw becomes negative.
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 9503d59..0ee0ec2 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -2432,7 +2432,7 @@ static int dl_overflow(struct task_struct *p,
> int policy, u64 new_bw = dl_policy(policy) ? to_ratio(period,
> runtime) : 0; int cpus, err = -1;
>
> - if (new_bw == p->dl.dl_bw)
> + if (task_has_dl_policy(p) && new_bw == p->dl.dl_bw)
> return 0;
This hunk actually fixes issue 2) mentioned above, so I think it should
be committed in a short time (independently from the rest of the
patch). And maybe is a good candidate for backporting to stable kernels?
Thanks,
Luca
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-10 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-08 12:45 [PATCH 0/2] sched/deadline: fix cpusets bandwidth accounting Juri Lelli
2016-02-08 12:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched/deadline: add per rq tracking of admitted bandwidth Juri Lelli
2016-02-10 11:32 ` Juri Lelli
2016-02-10 11:43 ` luca abeni
2016-02-10 11:58 ` Juri Lelli
2016-02-19 13:43 ` luca abeni
2016-02-19 14:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-02-19 14:53 ` luca abeni
2016-02-19 14:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-02-22 11:03 ` luca abeni
2016-02-22 10:57 ` [PATCH 0/3] cleanup " Luca Abeni
2016-02-22 10:57 ` [PATCH 1/4] Move some calls to __dl_{sub,add}_ac() from core.c to deadline.c Luca Abeni
2016-02-22 10:57 ` [PATCH 2/4] Move the remaining __dl_{sub,add}_ac() calls " Luca Abeni
2016-02-22 10:57 ` [PATCH 3/4] Remove dl_new Luca Abeni
2016-02-23 15:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-24 13:53 ` luca abeni
2016-02-25 9:46 ` Juri Lelli
2016-03-03 9:03 ` luca abeni
2016-03-03 9:28 ` Juri Lelli
2016-03-03 14:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-03-03 14:31 ` luca abeni
2016-03-03 16:12 ` Juri Lelli
2016-02-10 12:48 ` luca abeni [this message]
2016-02-10 13:42 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched/deadline: add per rq tracking of admitted bandwidth Juri Lelli
2016-02-23 15:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-23 15:51 ` Juri Lelli
2016-02-10 14:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-02-10 16:27 ` Juri Lelli
2016-02-11 12:12 ` Juri Lelli
2016-02-11 12:22 ` luca abeni
2016-02-11 12:27 ` Juri Lelli
2016-02-11 12:40 ` luca abeni
2016-02-11 12:49 ` Juri Lelli
2016-02-11 13:05 ` luca abeni
2016-02-11 14:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-02-11 17:10 ` Juri Lelli
2016-02-12 17:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-12 17:19 ` Juri Lelli
2016-02-24 19:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-24 21:46 ` luca abeni
2016-02-25 7:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-25 10:07 ` Juri Lelli
2016-02-25 10:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-24 9:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-11 21:48 ` Luca Abeni
2016-02-08 12:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/deadline: rq_{online,offline}_dl for root_domain changes Juri Lelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160210134848.12e6a6f8@utopia \
--to=luca.abeni@unitn.it \
--cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=wanpeng.li@hotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.