All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 19:01:30 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160217030130.GA31903@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160217020008.GC5972@X58A-UD3R>

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:00:08AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 04:41:39PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 09:11:03AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 09:42:12AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 09:44:35AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 04:08:37PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:25:03PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 10:14:44AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > > > > > So the reason I didn't mark them for stable is that they were non
> > > > > > > > trivial, however they've been in for a while now and nothing broke, so I
> > > > > > > > suppose backporting them isn't a problem.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > What do you think about the way to solve this oops problem? Could you just
> > > > > > > give your opinion of the way? Or ack or nack about this backporting?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Or would it be better to create a new simple patch with which we can solve
> > > > > > the oops problem, because your patch is too complicated to backport to
> > > > > > stable tree? What do you think about that?
> > > > > 
> > > > > I would prefer just backporting existing stuff, we know that works.
> > > > > 
> > > > > A separate patch for stable doesn't make sense to me; you get extra
> > > > > chances for fail and a divergent code-base.
> > > > 
> > > > I agree, I REALLY don't want to take patches that are not
> > > > identical-as-much-as-possible to what is in Linus's tree, because almost
> > > > every time we do, the patch is broken in some way.
> > > 
> > > I also agree and got it. Then could you check if this backporting is done
> > > properly?
> > 
> > What backporting of what to where by whom?
> > 
> > Come on, someone needs to actually send in some patches, in the correct
> > format, before anyone can do anything with them...
> 
> I am sorry for not ccing you when I sent the patches at first. (I didn't
> know I should do it.) There are the patches in this thread. Refer to,
> 
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/1/5/60

Ok, that's in my "to review" queue, along with 500+ other patches.  I'll
get to them eventually :)

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-17  3:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-05  8:52 [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches Byungchul Park
2016-01-05  9:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-12  8:47   ` Byungchul Park
2016-01-12 10:21   ` Willy Tarreau
2016-01-25  7:25   ` Byungchul Park
2016-02-16  7:08     ` Byungchul Park
2016-02-16  8:44       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-16 17:42         ` Greg KH
2016-02-17  0:11           ` Byungchul Park
2016-02-17  0:41             ` Greg KH
2016-02-17  2:00               ` Byungchul Park
2016-02-17  3:01                 ` Greg KH [this message]
2016-02-17  3:02                 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-02-23 21:05                   ` Ben Hutchings
2016-02-23 21:06                   ` Ben Hutchings
2016-01-05  9:16 ` [PATCH for v3.14.58 1/7] sched: Clean up idle task SMP logic Byungchul Park
2016-01-05  9:16   ` [PATCH for v3.14.58 2/7] sched: Replace post_schedule with a balance callback list Byungchul Park
2016-01-05  9:16   ` [PATCH for v3.14.58 3/7] sched: Allow balance callbacks for check_class_changed() Byungchul Park
2016-01-05  9:16   ` [PATCH for v3.14.58 4/7] sched,rt: Remove return value from pull_rt_task() Byungchul Park
2016-01-05  9:16   ` [PATCH for v3.14.58 5/7] sched, rt: Convert switched_{from, to}_rt() / prio_changed_rt() to balance callbacks Byungchul Park
2016-01-05  9:16   ` [PATCH for v3.14.58 6/7] sched,dl: Remove return value from pull_dl_task() Byungchul Park
2016-01-05  9:16   ` [PATCH for v3.14.58 7/7] sched, dl: Convert switched_{from, to}_dl() / prio_changed_dl() to balance callbacks Byungchul Park
2016-01-05  9:24 ` [PATCH for v3.18.25 1/6] sched: Replace post_schedule with a balance callback list Byungchul Park
2016-01-05  9:24   ` [PATCH for v3.18.25 2/6] sched: Allow balance callbacks for check_class_changed() Byungchul Park
2016-01-05  9:24   ` [PATCH for v3.18.25 3/6] sched,rt: Remove return value from pull_rt_task() Byungchul Park
2016-01-05  9:24   ` [PATCH for v3.18.25 4/6] sched, rt: Convert switched_{from, to}_rt() / prio_changed_rt() to balance callbacks Byungchul Park
2016-01-05  9:24   ` [PATCH for v3.18.25 5/6] sched,dl: Remove return value from pull_dl_task() Byungchul Park
2016-01-05  9:24   ` [PATCH for v3.18.25 6/6] sched, dl: Convert switched_{from, to}_dl() / prio_changed_dl() to balance callbacks Byungchul Park
2016-03-01  8:15 ` [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches Greg KH
2016-07-18  6:31   ` Byungchul Park
2016-07-18 12:09     ` Greg KH
2016-07-18 23:59       ` Byungchul Park
2016-06-13 18:31 ` Ben Hutchings

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160217030130.GA31903@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.