From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] virtio DMA API, yet again Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 11:29:03 +0200 Message-ID: <20160217112747-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Joerg Roedel , KVM , linux-s390 , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Stefano Stabellini , Sebastian Ott , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Christoph Hellwig , Christian Borntraeger , David Vrabel , Andy Lutomirski , "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini , Linux Virtualization , David Woodhouse , "David S. Miller" , Martin Schwidefsky List-ID: On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 09:48:58PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by > > module option. > > Michael, any update on this? > > --Andy I was hoping for an explicit ack from David Woodhouse, but I guess the informal "let's not hold this up" that was sent on v5 will do. I've queued this up for 4.6, thanks everyone! -- MST From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 09:29:03 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] virtio DMA API, yet again Message-Id: <20160217112747-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Joerg Roedel , KVM , linux-s390 , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Stefano Stabellini , Sebastian Ott , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Christoph Hellwig , Christian Borntraeger , David Vrabel , Andy Lutomirski , "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini , Linux Virtualization , David Woodhouse , "David S. Miller" , Martin Schwidefsky On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 09:48:58PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by > > module option. > > Michael, any update on this? > > --Andy I was hoping for an explicit ack from David Woodhouse, but I guess the informal "let's not hold this up" that was sent on v5 will do. I've queued this up for 4.6, thanks everyone! -- MST From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933814AbcBQJ3Q (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Feb 2016 04:29:16 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56142 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754242AbcBQJ3N (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Feb 2016 04:29:13 -0500 Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 11:29:03 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Andy Lutomirski , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , David Woodhouse , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "David S. Miller" , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Joerg Roedel , Christian Borntraeger , Cornelia Huck , Sebastian Ott , Paolo Bonzini , Christoph Hellwig , KVM , Martin Schwidefsky , linux-s390 , Linux Virtualization , David Vrabel , Stefano Stabellini , "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] virtio DMA API, yet again Message-ID: <20160217112747-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 09:48:58PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by > > module option. > > Michael, any update on this? > > --Andy I was hoping for an explicit ack from David Woodhouse, but I guess the informal "let's not hold this up" that was sent on v5 will do. I've queued this up for 4.6, thanks everyone! -- MST