From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48146) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWNMi-0000PQ-EI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:07:25 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWNMd-0004jA-G6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:07:24 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38638) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWNMd-0004j6-Ar for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:07:19 -0500 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE14270D85 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 12:07:18 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:07:14 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20160218120714.GA25803@redhat.com> References: <20160204171617.GM26314@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> <20160204195522-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <20160204190944.GO26314@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> <20160204221416.GA21272@redhat.com> <20160205144611.GQ26314@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> <20160206201057-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <20160211155130.GA6239@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> <20160211183032-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <87twleci0k.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> <87ziuygtcj.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ziuygtcj.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/5] q35: Remove old machines and unused compat code List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: Eduardo Habkost , Marcel Apfelbaum , John Snow , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini , Igor Mammedov , Laszlo Ersek On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 12:18:04PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote: > No reply from you since Monday. Yes but I'm flooded with other stuff to review. I'll get back to it, 3 days isn't such a long time. > You can > > (a) Apply Eduardo's series. > > (b) Debate its merits. > > (c) Declare the debate stuck, and put it on the agenda for the next KVM > call. > > (d) Other (do tell). Thinking it over on the weekend can't hurt, so I intend to do this. Meanwhile, you could help by reviewing the patchset and sending acks on list (maybe you did, but I can't find it). > What you can't do make the problem go away by ignoring it. It hasn't > gone away for six months and two releases. I don't think there's a problem as such - the patchset is just supposed to simplify maintainance - but I don't intend to ignore the patchset. -- MST