From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon) Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 17:09:52 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v3 1/4] of/fdt: factor out assignment of initrd_start/initrd_end In-Reply-To: References: <1455289046-21321-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> <1455289046-21321-2-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> <20160222164958.GJ31168@arm.com> Message-ID: <20160222170952.GM31168@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 05:56:40PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On 22 February 2016 at 17:49, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 03:57:23PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > >> Since architectures may not yet have their linear mapping up and running > >> when the initrd address is discovered from the DT, factor out the > >> assignment of initrd_start and initrd_end, so that an architecture can > >> override it and use the translation it needs. > >> > >> Cc: Rob Herring > >> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel > >> --- > >> drivers/of/fdt.c | 14 +++++++++++--- > >> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > Mark, Rob, any comments on this? > > > > Already acked by Rob, and pulled into -next by Catalin ... Weird, I don't see that in my inbox or on the list archives. Where should I be looking? I'd certainly like to see some performance measurement of the BUG_ON in PHYS_ADDR that is introduced later in the series too. Will