From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
eranian@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
vince@deater.net, dvyukov@google.com, andi@firstfloor.org,
sasha.levin@oracle.com, oleg@redhat.com,
Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/7] perf: Fix scaling vs enable_on_exec
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 22:44:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160223214436.GC23528@krava.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160223154849.GC9102@krava.redhat.com>
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 04:48:49PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 04:27:29PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 03:37:47PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > Oleg reported that enable_on_exec results in weird scale factors.
> > >
> > > The recent commit 3e349507d12d ("perf: Fix perf_enable_on_exec() event
> > > scheduling") caused this by moving task_ctx_sched_out() from before
> > > __perf_event_mask_enable() to after it.
> > >
> > > The overlooked concequence of that change is that task_ctx_sched_out()
> > > would update the ctx time fields, and now __perf_event_mask_enable()
> > > uses stale time.
> > >
> > > Fix this by adding an explicit time update.
> > >
> > > While looking at this, I also found that we need an ctx->is_active
> > > check in perf_install_in_context().
> > >
> > > XXX: does this actually fix the reported issue? I'm not sure what the
> > > reproduction case is. Also an earlier version made Jiri's machine
> > > explode -- something I've not managed to reproduce either.
> >
> > Jiri, can you have a look at this and perhaps share the reproducer?
>
> yep, I'm testing this patchset, but got stuck with 'crash' tool to get
> some reasonable output.. got stuck on unrelated sched deadlock ;-)
>
> the reproducer is described in this email:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=145568006709552&w=2
so I finally got some reasonable backtrace and figured that crash finally:
#7 [ffff8802751afcd0] general_protection at ffffffff817a69e8
[exception RIP: special_mapping_fault+47]
RIP: ffffffff811e40df RSP: ffff8802751afd88 RFLAGS: 00010282
RAX: ffff8802747e8b68 RBX: 00007fffffffe080 RCX: c4712d0070657267
RDX: ffff8802751afd98 RSI: ffff8802742c4f00 RDI: ffff8802747e8b68
RBP: ffff8802751afd88 R8: 0000000000000000 R9: ffff8802751afe58
R10: 00000000000001fe R11: 00003fffffe00000 R12: ffff8802742c4f00
R13: ffff8802751afe58 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff880273f59ff8
ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0000
#8 [ffff8802751afd90] __do_fault at ffffffff811db505
#9 [ffff8802751afdf8] handle_mm_fault at ffffffff811e0b03
#10 [ffff8802751afec8] __do_page_fault at ffffffff8106734a
#11 [ffff8802751aff20] do_page_fault at ffffffff810675df
#12 [ffff8802751aff50] page_fault at ffffffff817a6a48
it was caused by:
- f872f5400cc0 mm: Add a vm_special_mapping.fault() method
that added call of vm_special_mapping::fault if it's defined
- and uprobes code not initializing this fault pointer properly,
attached patch fixed the issue for me,
Oleg, I'm not sure this is how you want to fix this though..
however I still see the off by 1 as Pratyush said:
65536;;probe_exact:f_65535x;132185462;100.00
I have another patch making the ena/run times equal for software
events in read syscal, and that obviously works.. but I'm not sure
how fix this otherwise ATM
thanks,
jirka
---
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 0167679182c0..0c045aad28a2 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -1169,7 +1169,7 @@ static struct xol_area *__create_xol_area(unsigned long vaddr)
uprobe_opcode_t insn = UPROBE_SWBP_INSN;
struct xol_area *area;
- area = kmalloc(sizeof(*area), GFP_KERNEL);
+ area = kzalloc(sizeof(*area), GFP_KERNEL);
if (unlikely(!area))
goto out;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-23 21:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-19 14:37 [RFC][PATCH 0/7] perf: more fuzzer inspired patches Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-19 14:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/7] perf: Close install vs exit race Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-19 14:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/7] perf: Do not double free Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-19 14:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/7] perf: Allow perf_release() with !event->ctx Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-19 14:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/7] perf: Fix scaling vs enable_on_exec Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-23 15:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-23 15:48 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-02-23 16:35 ` Pratyush Anand
2016-02-23 17:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-24 11:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-24 14:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-24 16:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-25 4:07 ` Pratyush Anand
2016-02-23 21:44 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2016-02-26 2:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-02-19 14:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/7] perf: Fix cloning Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-19 14:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/7] perf: Fix race between event install and jump_labels Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-19 14:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/7] perf: Cure event->pending_disable race Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160223214436.GC23528@krava.redhat.com \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=panand@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
--cc=vince@deater.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.