From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:56433 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751174AbcBXFCl (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:02:41 -0500 Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 21:02:40 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Michael Ellerman Cc: amodra@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, stable-commits@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Patch "powerpc: Simplify module TOC handling" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree Message-ID: <20160224050240.GA21245@kroah.com> References: <1456284289203239@kroah.com> <1456289485.12154.3.camel@ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1456289485.12154.3.camel@ellerman.id.au> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 03:51:25PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Tue, 2016-02-23 at 19:24 -0800, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > > > > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled > > > > powerpc: Simplify module TOC handling > > > > to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at: > > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary > > > > The filename of the patch is: > > powerpc-simplify-module-toc-handling.patch > > and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory. > > > > If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, > > please let know about it. > > > > > > From c153693d7eb9eeb28478aa2deaaf0b4e7b5ff5e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Alan Modra > > Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 20:52:22 +1100 > > Subject: powerpc: Simplify module TOC handling > > > > From: Alan Modra > > > > commit c153693d7eb9eeb28478aa2deaaf0b4e7b5ff5e9 upstream. > > > Hi Greg, > > Please drop this commit, it requires a corresponding change to depmod which we > need to get accepted first. If I drop this one, then the next patch in the series, "powerpc: Fix dedotify for binutils >= 2.26" does not apply, so I'll have to drop that as well. Is that acceptable? thanks, greg k-h