From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760345AbcBYMt3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Feb 2016 07:49:29 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:49615 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752279AbcBYMt2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Feb 2016 07:49:28 -0500 Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 09:49:24 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: "Wangnan (F)" Cc: jolsa@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Brendan Gregg , Masami Hiramatsu , Namhyung Kim , Li Zefan , pi3orama@163.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] perf script: Print bpf-output events in 'perf script' Message-ID: <20160225124924.GJ8720@kernel.org> References: <1456312845-111583-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com> <1456312845-111583-3-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com> <20160224151918.GC8720@kernel.org> <56CE7EDF.7030808@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56CE7EDF.7030808@huawei.com> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:11:11PM +0800, Wangnan (F) escreveu: > > > On 2016/2/24 23:19, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > >Em Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:20:45AM +0000, Wang Nan escreveu: > >>This patch allows 'perf script' output messages from BPF program. > >>For example, use test_bpf_output_3.c at the end of this commit > >>message, > >> > >> # ./perf record -e bpf-output/no-inherit,name=evt/ \ > >> -e ./test_bpf_output_3.c/map:channel.event=evt/ \ > >> usleep 100000 > >Trying to test this with 'perf trace', i.e. to shortcircuit record + > >analysis: > > > >[root@jouet bpf]# perf trace -a --ev bpf-output/no-inherit,name=evt/ --ev ./test_bpf_output_3.c/map:channel.event=evt/ --ev 'perf_bpf_probe:*' usleep 100000 > >Failed to set filter "common_pid != 23954" on event evt with 22 (Invalid argument) > > > >Can't we set tracepoint filters on these events? > No we can't. filters can only be set to tracepoint events, but > bpf-output is a software event. Gack, should've checked that, I somehow thought that it was a tracepoint event of some sort. > In addition, you don't need > ... --ev 'perf_bpf_probe:*' ... > > because they should be already collected by '--ev ./test_bpf_output_3.c'. Right, that was me trying to be clever 8-) > You don't see them because the two kprobe events are filtered out by > BPF program. See 'return 0' in func. Thanks for reminding about this part... > Thank you.