From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com (mail-wm0-f68.google.com [74.125.82.68]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03478771F2 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 14:22:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f68.google.com with SMTP id c200so3757066wme.0 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 06:22:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:date:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=IfqxEvBJLGBbCuVVtywsy8gqBRxG5EsfulAI2285M1I=; b=Y55v3bFuJvF48sFPZTB9lDeSJDXPHFZbvWxFxyit0IEbVMN3RcuCl+aO8BjluUWi6g ZAvPrpKfOk7Tpeb2NOna58/p57py2CwB9iwNl2P7YKn/nga7xGkvNkkPnxgClTUwdohr +8hIoYPdaTrburOXBtNECzyAJG2fETtCRXMueX/oDvKaNgARPHiNzvLItQovh/2/olx4 7hfBE+9n/wlBwnOPANyVWchxTJ1sTmA3ih6ZEr3tT+QuABySySe32sFOuDZP+odvYoYo s8iTOQVSv8N/Zt9I8PjrRpksIrI0ecNOGbBkRFXAQ5J+8X81gXPaazRC+fYGTg1HxSbF mY+Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=IfqxEvBJLGBbCuVVtywsy8gqBRxG5EsfulAI2285M1I=; b=eopTIeD3icALa22vMnBxZ3Ev9Oj0r8sgQXh5JnM0Xo4810DTk+qGcuJsVVI33AM68k /uCLZ2Sl5FiFt42lBtPEFkA8/3LBrv6+rApZd1N/OROAtiaAWgft6vMa11ihZOduwXim mvdlDR+Er6fBfEAxmLgq53gQpSiweHD9fpn+E+UyA3uMOgIiuZBn/z5bTpWDxO0l1KCo gDpWJgorZcE+Gn2ww2x36/DkKGrKpTMgNfzkmSJo+uSfCOgy5QzMChZ1rupRChTpR2E/ XWPFRFWXVfkDwsp5fNQz2Sy0UPp6QWQo4sHJ2ype2w3n4CsTdvMZ93xxFYdm4E88h0Og GH/Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSeVK4/SDblVD0VUcCPIRRDiCTJPr+ZlQ9oZV44cFcyIhT721l4XnqaW5TxrYt/yw== X-Received: by 10.194.90.172 with SMTP id bx12mr45269171wjb.128.1456410127879; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 06:22:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (ip-86-49-34-37.net.upcbroadband.cz. [86.49.34.37]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ls5sm8135498wjb.33.2016.02.25.06.22.06 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 25 Feb 2016 06:22:06 -0800 (PST) From: Martin Jansa X-Google-Original-From: Martin Jansa Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 15:23:20 +0100 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20160225142320.GB2565@jama> References: <20160224164704.GH2560@jama> <56CF0363.5070207@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56CF0363.5070207@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/34] Initial gobject introspection support for meta-openembedded X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 14:22:08 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 60203 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oTHb8nViIGeoXxdp" Content-Disposition: inline --oTHb8nViIGeoXxdp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 03:36:35PM +0200, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On 02/24/2016 06:47 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > > > Many people aren't using poky and don't want to play with combo-layer or > > format-patch/am combo to reapply the patches from poky repo to oe-core > > repo. > > > > As you're definitely used to such strange environment, can you please > > push corresponding branch for oe-core to openembedded-core-contrib repo > > as well? > > > > Thanks! > > > > I should start reading the cover letters :), will remove this from > > master-next until openembedded-core-contrib branch is available. >=20 > I think you misunderstood my intent somewhat. I don't want you to queue= =20 > these patches anywhere, they are preliminary. Their purpose is twofold: >=20 > 1) People interested in playing and testing that poky branch with=20 > introspection may want to use recipes or whole layers from meta-oe as=20 > well (gupnp for instance). >=20 > 2) I'd like to demonstrate to you that meta-oe will be taken care of=20 > when introspection lands in oe-core, because historically there's been=20 > some bad blood regarding those disruptive oe-core changes :) Thanks I appreciate it. > However, I'm reluctant to provide the patchset for oe-contrib. The=20 > reason is that I've been maintaining the poky patchset since November;=20 > it's more or less rebasing, merge conflicts fixing and world rebuilding= =20 > once every one or two weeks. I wouldn't want to duplicate this ongoing=20 > work for oe-contrib as well, and keep the two branches in sync, because= =20 > I don't actually know when these patches make it to master. So if you=20 > want to try them out against pure oe-core, you have to extract and apply= =20 > them by hand, I'm afraid. As a one-off task, it should not be complicated. As you stated above it's not one-off task, because you're still updating the branch. I'll just ignore both patchsets until both are ready and for correct repositories, I'm not personally interested in introspection. Thanks --=20 Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com --oTHb8nViIGeoXxdp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlbPDlcACgkQN1Ujt2V2gBwG5wCfVL0fJnmTSFXiQGnpG9qhsAB5 UOkAoJBbbwyW1hWdXy/BNdnzfrZ3/TAO =yBLa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oTHb8nViIGeoXxdp--