From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nft] datatype, meta: add new ifname_type for iifname/oifname
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 12:00:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160301110055.GA22817@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160301101114.GA2654@salvia>
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> > Ok, but how do you plan to handle the key length?
>
> Right, in concatenations we can infer this from the lhs, but in set
> definitions there is not way.
Okay. So whats the plan there?
> What I would suggest is to recover a patch that Patrick submitted that
> introduces typeof(X) so we can use this from set definitions. We can
> store in the TLV the original subtype X as a string. Thus, when
> listing back to userspace we can use this information to display back
> the typeof(X).
So you mean you'd use something like
nft add set filter ifnames '{typeof(meta iifname); }' ?
That should indeed work since we can derive the size
from the meta iifname (or whatever other field),
> We have to potentially support every meta and packet selector,
> including crazy ones as 48 bits fields, and last time we discussed
> this, we agreed that adding one type per field size is not the way to
> go.
Ok, yes, I see your point.
> Let me know your opinion on this, thanks!
I think typeof would be good; we could indeed derive the key size with
this without the need for a new type.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-01 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-26 19:19 [PATCH nft] datatype, meta: add new ifname_type for iifname/oifname Florian Westphal
2016-02-29 13:12 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-02-29 13:19 ` Florian Westphal
2016-03-01 10:11 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-03-01 11:00 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2016-03-01 13:15 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160301110055.GA22817@breakpoint.cc \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.