From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753130AbcCALFd (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Mar 2016 06:05:33 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:41345 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752340AbcCALFb (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Mar 2016 06:05:31 -0500 Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 12:05:29 +0100 From: Petr Mladek To: Sergey Senozhatsky Cc: Andrew Morton , Jan Kara , Peter Zijlstra , Steven Rostedt , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sergey Senozhatsky Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk/nmi: restore printk_func in nmi_panic Message-ID: <20160301110528.GO3305@pathway.suse.cz> References: <1456457840-1059-1-git-send-email-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> <20160226145717.GZ12548@pathway.suse.cz> <20160227021944.GA1621@swordfish> <20160229103141.GL3305@pathway.suse.cz> <20160229111937.GA356@swordfish> <20160301092426.GA2968@swordfish> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160301092426.GA2968@swordfish> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue 2016-03-01 18:24:26, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > Hello, > > On (02/29/16 20:19), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > [..] > > > That is the problem. zap_locks() is not a solution. > > > > > > First, it handles only lockbuf_lock and console_sem. There are other > > > locks used by particular consoles that might cause a deadlock. > > > > yes, well, that's true for panic() in general. > > Petr, what do you think of this (added PRINTK_NMI_FLUSH_ON_PANIC)? > > 1) zap_locks() in console_flush_on_panic() > 2) add PRINTK_NMI_FLUSH_ON_PANIC symbols > 3) add printk_nmi_flush_on_panic() This is definitely better than nothing. Well, it seems that the printk/NMI patches that motivated this patch will be removed for a while, see http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/482845/focus=483002 I want to play with the panic handling a bit more and make it better working out of box. It might be enough to put the messages into the rind buffer when crashdump is going to be produced. Also there is still the idea about using the lock-less early console. I think that the solution from this patch might be the last fallback. Thanks a lot for proposals, Petr