From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] sched/core: Get rid of 'cpu' argument in wq_worker_sleeping()
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 13:03:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160302120316.GD6356@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3cc0bf6e136c1177c9dd56d567d5e3f76147d456.1456919394.git.agordeev@redhat.com>
This really should also have been Cc'ed to TJ, doing so now.
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 12:53:31PM +0100, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> Given that wq_worker_sleeping() could only be called for a
> CPU it is running on, we do not need passing a CPU ID as an
> argument.
>
> Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 2 +-
> kernel/workqueue.c | 5 ++---
> kernel/workqueue_internal.h | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 423452c..735e87c 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -3183,7 +3183,7 @@ static void __sched notrace __schedule(bool preempt)
> if (prev->flags & PF_WQ_WORKER) {
> struct task_struct *to_wakeup;
>
> - to_wakeup = wq_worker_sleeping(prev, cpu);
> + to_wakeup = wq_worker_sleeping(prev);
> if (to_wakeup)
> try_to_wake_up_local(to_wakeup);
> }
> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
> index 7ff5dc7..2fa8d26 100644
> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -858,7 +858,6 @@ void wq_worker_waking_up(struct task_struct *task, int cpu)
> /**
> * wq_worker_sleeping - a worker is going to sleep
> * @task: task going to sleep
> - * @cpu: CPU in question, must be the current CPU number
> *
> * This function is called during schedule() when a busy worker is
> * going to sleep. Worker on the same cpu can be woken up by
> @@ -870,7 +869,7 @@ void wq_worker_waking_up(struct task_struct *task, int cpu)
> * Return:
> * Worker task on @cpu to wake up, %NULL if none.
> */
> -struct task_struct *wq_worker_sleeping(struct task_struct *task, int cpu)
> +struct task_struct *wq_worker_sleeping(struct task_struct *task)
> {
> struct worker *worker = kthread_data(task), *to_wakeup = NULL;
> struct worker_pool *pool;
> @@ -886,7 +885,7 @@ struct task_struct *wq_worker_sleeping(struct task_struct *task, int cpu)
> pool = worker->pool;
>
> /* this can only happen on the local cpu */
> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu != raw_smp_processor_id() || pool->cpu != cpu))
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(pool->cpu != raw_smp_processor_id()))
> return NULL;
>
> /*
> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue_internal.h b/kernel/workqueue_internal.h
> index 4521587..8635417 100644
> --- a/kernel/workqueue_internal.h
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue_internal.h
> @@ -69,6 +69,6 @@ static inline struct worker *current_wq_worker(void)
> * sched/core.c and workqueue.c.
> */
> void wq_worker_waking_up(struct task_struct *task, int cpu);
> -struct task_struct *wq_worker_sleeping(struct task_struct *task, int cpu);
> +struct task_struct *wq_worker_sleeping(struct task_struct *task);
>
> #endif /* _KERNEL_WORKQUEUE_INTERNAL_H */
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-02 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-02 11:53 [PATCH v3 0/2] sched/core: Cleanup leftovers in __schedule() Alexander Gordeev
2016-03-02 11:53 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] sched/core: Get rid of 'cpu' argument in wq_worker_sleeping() Alexander Gordeev
2016-03-02 12:03 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-03-02 15:28 ` Tejun Heo
2016-03-02 11:53 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] sched/core: Get rid of 'cpu' local variable in __schedule() Alexander Gordeev
2016-03-02 12:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160302120316.GD6356@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=agordeev@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.