From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: Laura Garcia Liebana <nevola@gmail.com>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, shivanib134@gmail.com,
outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] extensions: libxt_statistic: Add translation to nft
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 13:33:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160302123339.GA4930@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160302121033.GA4348@breakpoint.cc>
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 01:10:33PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> > I think meta random 0.10000000009 will only match for the exact case.
>
> No; I thought that 'nft ... meta random 0.5' should on average match half of
> the time so the proposed nft prandom patch set makes LE the default op.
>
> So meta random 0.1 is in fact 'meta random le 0.1' (and nft will display
> it like this).
>
> > > $ iptables-translate -A INPUT -m statistic --mode random ! --probability
> > > 0.1 -j ACCEPT
> > > nft add rule ip filter INPUT meta random != 0.10000000009 counter accept
> >
> > Then, the opposite has to be:
> >
> > meta random gte 0.10000000009
>
> Good point, this is not intuitive.
>
> Currently if no operator is given and the type is TYPE_PROBABILITY then
> we just use le instead of eq (just like we pick "&" in some cases).
>
> But if user asks 'meta random ne 0.1' then the match propability is close
> to 100%.
>
> Do you think its enough to just document that you need to use le/ge etc.
> for this?
>
> Other option would be to rewrite NE to GE if rh value is a probability,
> but I'm not sure if such 'helpful' logic isn't too likely to get in the
> way.
>
> Yet another option is to just disallow EQ and NE ops and throw an error.
>
> Other suggestions?
I'm fine with the probability scaling, but I think we should keep this
consistent with other selectors, so I would use lt and gte instead
here.
We can potentially use ranges here too and other available operations
such as prefixes (although this one I don't know use case for this).
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-02 12:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-01 20:40 [PATCH v3] extensions: libxt_statistic: Add translation to nft Laura Garcia Liebana
2016-03-02 11:46 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-03-02 12:10 ` Florian Westphal
2016-03-02 12:33 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2016-03-02 12:37 ` Florian Westphal
2016-03-02 12:46 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-03-02 13:44 ` Florian Westphal
2016-03-02 13:52 ` Jan Engelhardt
2016-03-02 14:50 ` Florian Westphal
2016-03-02 14:54 ` Jan Engelhardt
2016-03-02 14:59 ` Florian Westphal
2016-03-02 15:17 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-03-02 15:17 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-03-02 15:29 ` Florian Westphal
2016-03-02 15:56 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160302123339.GA4930@salvia \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nevola@gmail.com \
--cc=outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com \
--cc=shivanib134@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.