From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Westphal Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] extensions: libxt_statistic: Add translation to nft Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 13:37:38 +0100 Message-ID: <20160302123738.GB4348@breakpoint.cc> References: <20160301204042.GA15382@sonyv> <20160302114611.GA3008@salvia> <20160302121033.GA4348@breakpoint.cc> <20160302123339.GA4930@salvia> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Florian Westphal , Laura Garcia Liebana , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, shivanib134@gmail.com, outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com To: Pablo Neira Ayuso Return-path: Received: from Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc ([80.244.247.6]:52121 "EHLO Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755155AbcCBMhk (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2016 07:37:40 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160302123339.GA4930@salvia> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: [ nft meta random ] > I'm fine with the probability scaling, but I think we should keep this > consistent with other selectors, so I would use lt and gte instead > here. > > We can potentially use ranges here too and other available operations > such as prefixes (although this one I don't know use case for this). Ok, so just to clarify. You want me to submit v2 of nft meta random patch set that turns: meta random value into meta random lt value ... and ... meta random ne value into meta random ge value Is that correct? Sorry, I am a bit confused :)