From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com (Kirill A. Shutemov) Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 18:11:52 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] arm: mm: Fix definition of pmd_mknotpresent In-Reply-To: <1456880580-22311-1-git-send-email-steve.capper@arm.com> References: <1456880580-22311-1-git-send-email-steve.capper@arm.com> Message-ID: <20160302151152.GA94701@black.fi.intel.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 01:03:00AM +0000, Steve Capper wrote: > Currently pmd_mknotpresent will use a zero entry to respresent an > invalidated pmd. > > Unfortunately this definition clashes with pmd_none, thus it is > possible for a race condition to occur if zap_pmd_range sees pmd_none > whilst __split_huge_pmd_locked is running too with pmdp_invalidate > just called. > > This patch fixes the race condition by modifying pmd_mknotpresent to > create non-zero faulting entries (as is done in other architectures), > removing the ambiguity with pmd_none. > > Fixes: 8d9625070073 ("ARM: mm: Transparent huge page support for LPAE systems.") > Reported-by: Kirill A. Shutemov > Signed-off-by: Steve Capper > Acked-by: Will Deacon > > --- > > This patch addresses an issue discussed at: > http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1602.3/01846.html > > --- > arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h > index dc46398..451b6e7 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h > @@ -249,10 +249,10 @@ PMD_BIT_FUNC(mkyoung, |= PMD_SECT_AF); > #define pfn_pmd(pfn,prot) (__pmd(((phys_addr_t)(pfn) << PAGE_SHIFT) | pgprot_val(prot))) > #define mk_pmd(page,prot) pfn_pmd(page_to_pfn(page),prot) > > -/* represent a notpresent pmd by zero, this is used by pmdp_invalidate */ > +/* represent a notpresent pmd by faulting entry, this is used by pmdp_invalidate */ > static inline pmd_t pmd_mknotpresent(pmd_t pmd) > { > - return __pmd(0); > + return __pmd(pmd_val(pmd) & ~PMD_TYPE_MASK); I'm confused. Wouldn't it still be present? arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable.h:#define pmd_present(pmd) (pmd_val(pmd)) Shouldn't pmd_present() be re-defined as (pmd_val(pmd) & PMD_TYPE_MASK) or something? -- Kirill A. Shutemov