From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
To: Sergei Lebedev <sergei.a.lebedev@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] xs.watch and xs.unwatch are unreliable
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 16:03:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160302160338.GA23172@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <834E88AE-F08A-415F-8C24-D4FDEFEB01B3@gmail.com>
I've CC'ed some people who might have an idea whether they are replying
on this behaviour. I doubt that but let's better be sure...
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 11:17:54PM +0300, Sergei Lebedev wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I’ve initially wanted to report another inconsistency in ``xen.lowlevel.xs`` documentation, but this time the issue is more subtle.
>
> Both ``xs.watch`` and ``xs.unwatch`` accept two arguments: a path to watch and a token. According to the documentation, the second argument must be a string, which makes sense, since the token should be sent directly to XenStore. Instead of doing the simple thing (transmitting the token as-is), the implementation makes a new token from *the pointer* to the token object and sends it instead:
>
> PyObject *token;
> char token_str[MAX_STRLEN(unsigned long) + 1];
>
> snprintf(token_str, sizeof(token_str), "%li", (unsigned long)token);
>
> This does work for simple cases, e.g. if a token is a string literal
>
> >>> from xen.lowlevel.xs import xs
> >>> h = xs()
> >>> h.watch(“@introduceDomain”, “token”)
> >>> h.unwatch(“@introduceDomain”, “token”)
>
> or a small number
>
> >>> h.watch(“@introduceDomain”, 42)
> >>> h.unwatch(“@introduceDomain”, 42)
>
> But in the general case this is broken
>
> >>> h.watch("@introduceDomain", 100000000000000000000000000000)
> >>> h.unwatch("@introduceDomain", 100000000000000000000000000000)
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
> xen.lowlevel.xs.Error: (2, 'No such file or directory’)
>
> Here’s another example with a string token
>
> >>> token1 = str(100000000000000000000000000000)
> >>> token2 = str(100000000000000000000000000000)
> >>> token1 == token2
> True
> >>> h.watch("@introduceDomain", token1)
> >>> h.unwatch("@introduceDomain", token2)
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
> xen.lowlevel.xs.Error: (2, 'No such file or directory’)
>
> I’m not sure what would be the best way to handle this as there might be existing code relying on this undocumented behaviour. What do you think?
>
In any case this looks like a real bug.
The fix (as you said) is to transmit the token. I don't think your
proposed fix would break existing users though.
Wei.
> Regards,
> Sergei
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-02 16:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-01 20:17 [BUG] xs.watch and xs.unwatch are unreliable Sergei Lebedev
2016-03-02 16:03 ` Wei Liu [this message]
2016-03-03 16:47 ` David Vrabel
2016-03-03 17:02 ` Wei Liu
2016-03-03 17:18 ` David Vrabel
2016-03-03 18:57 ` Wei Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160302160338.GA23172@citrix.com \
--to=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=sergei.a.lebedev@gmail.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.