Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH] staging: lustre: ptlrpc: Use list_for_each_entry_safe()

[Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 05:20:21PM -0500, Janani Ravichandran wrote:
> Use list_for_each_entry_safe() instead of a combination of
> list_for_each_safe() and list_entry(). Also remove variable pos
> which becomes useless as a result.
> Semantic patch used:
> 
> @a@
> expression pos, n, head;
> expression mem;
> type t;
> identifier var;
> iterator name list_for_each_entry_safe, list_for_each_safe;
> @@
> 
> - list_for_each_safe(pos, n, head)
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(var, n, head, mem)
>   {
>    ... when != var
> -  var = \(list_entry \| container_of\)(pos, t, mem);
>    ... when != pos
>   }
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janani Ravichandran <janani.rvchndrn@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/ptlrpcd.c | 7 +++----
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Does not apply to the tree properly :(