From: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org,
mitake.hitoshi@lab.ntt.co.jp, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
v.tolstov@selfip.ru, mreitz@redhat.com, namei.unix@gmail.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/1] block/sheepdog: fix argument passed to qemu_strtoul()
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 11:36:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160302163638.GA8345@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56D71535.9040008@redhat.com>
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 09:30:45AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 03/02/2016 09:24 AM, Jeff Cody wrote:
> > The function qemu_strtoul() reads 'unsigned long' sized data,
> > which is larger than uint32_t on 64-bit machines.
> >
> > Even though the snap_id field in the header is 32-bits, we must
> > accomodate the full size in qemu_strtoul().
>
> s/accomodate/accommodate/
Thanks, I'll fix that up when applying this patch to my block branch.
>
> Someday, it might be nice to write a qemu_strtoi() and qemu_strtoui()
> that provide a guaranteed 32-bit result, rather than a
> platform-dependent width (we already have qemu_strto[u]ll() for 64-bit
> results). It's a bit tricky, since C doesn't provide a native parsing
> to int, and the case for overflow detection is different on 32-bit
> machines than on 64-bit machines (libvirt took a couple of tries before
> getting something that worked correctly), but would probably be worth it
> in the long run.
>
> But that idea doesn't have to hold up this patch.
>
> --
> Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
> Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-02 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-02 16:24 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/1] block/sheepdog: fix argument passed to qemu_strtoul() Jeff Cody
2016-03-02 16:28 ` Max Reitz
2016-03-02 16:30 ` Eric Blake
2016-03-02 16:36 ` Jeff Cody [this message]
2016-03-02 16:32 ` Max Reitz
2016-03-02 16:36 ` Jeff Cody
2016-03-03 4:07 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2016-03-03 4:06 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2016-03-10 2:35 ` Jeff Cody
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160302163638.GA8345@localhost.localdomain \
--to=jcody@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mitake.hitoshi@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=namei.unix@gmail.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=v.tolstov@selfip.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.