From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:42593 "EHLO
	ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753105AbcCBUGg (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 2 Mar 2016 15:06:36 -0500
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 20:06:34 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Frank Sorenson <sorenson@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, dwysocha@redhat.com, lvaz@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] fs: simplify freeze_super()/thaw_super() exit
 handling
Message-ID: <20160302200634.GK17997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
References: <1456945319-16283-1-git-send-email-sorenson@redhat.com>
 <1456945319-16283-2-git-send-email-sorenson@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1456945319-16283-2-git-send-email-sorenson@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 01:01:55PM -0600, Frank Sorenson wrote:
> Change freeze_super() and thaw_super() to have a common exit

What makes it a simplification in any kind of sense?