All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Linn Crosetto <linn@hpe.com>
Cc: matt@codeblueprint.co.uk, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org,
	roy.franz@linaro.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64/efi: query Secure Boot status according to UEFI spec
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 11:08:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160304110853.GA29227@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1457041550-15736-1-git-send-email-linn@hpe.com>

On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 02:45:48PM -0700, Linn Crosetto wrote:
> This series modifies the function that queries the status of UEFI Secure Boot
> in the EFI stub to match the UEFI specification, and allow the caller to
> determine if it is enabled, disabled, or in an unknown state due to an
> unexpected error from GetVariable().
> 
> v2:
>  - Add return values for unexpected errors
>  - Split changes into two patches
> 
> v3:
>  - Add more verbosity with additional prints
> 
> Linn Crosetto (2):
>   arm64/efi: report unexpected errors when determining Secure Boot status
>   arm64/efi: check SetupMode when determining Secure Boot status
> 
>  drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm-stub.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

For the series:

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Mark

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-03-04 11:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-24  0:25 [PATCH] arm64/efi: check SetupMode when determining Secure Boot status Linn Crosetto
2016-02-24 11:23 ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-26  0:18 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] arm64/efi: query Secure Boot status according to UEFI spec Linn Crosetto
2016-02-26  0:18   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64/efi: report unexpected errors when determining Secure Boot status Linn Crosetto
2016-03-03  8:03     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-26  0:18   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64/efi: check SetupMode " Linn Crosetto
2016-03-02 13:38   ` [PATCH v2 0/2] arm64/efi: query Secure Boot status according to UEFI spec Matt Fleming
2016-03-03 21:45   ` [PATCH v3 " Linn Crosetto
2016-03-03 21:45     ` [PATCH v3 1/2] arm64/efi: report unexpected errors when determining Secure Boot status Linn Crosetto
2016-03-04  7:57       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-03-03 21:45     ` [PATCH v3 2/2] arm64/efi: check SetupMode " Linn Crosetto
2016-03-04  8:01       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-03-04 11:08     ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2016-03-07 14:08     ` [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64/efi: query Secure Boot status according to UEFI spec Matt Fleming

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160304110853.GA29227@leverpostej \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=linn@hpe.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=roy.franz@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.