From: keith.busch@intel.com (Keith Busch)
Subject: [PATCH] nvme: avoid cqe corruption when update at the same time as read
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 15:07:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160310150745.GA23087@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160310143650.GA8689@infradead.org>
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016@06:36:50AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016@12:08:48PM +0100, Marta Rybczynska wrote:
> > Looks like a good refactoring to me. However, it seems to me that in
> > nvme_cqe_valid we should be checking for phase, not for head.
>
> Yeah, this doesn't work as-is. I still think that non-obvious
> check should be split out into something. Maybe just:
>
> static inline bool nvme_cqe_valid(struct nvme_queue *nvmeq, u16 head, u16 phase)
> {
> return (le16_to_cpu(nvmeq->cqes[head].status) & 1) == phase;
> }
Looks good.
The code had copied the CQE since the initial commit, so just want to
mention a torn CQE read could cause real trouble only if the Phase is
out of sync with the Command ID. These are in the same DWORD and many
(most?) archs compile to read those 4-bytes atomically.
We certainly can't rely on that, so this is a good change.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-10 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1963234885.1121305.1457109031908.JavaMail.zimbra@kalray.eu>
2016-03-05 7:23 ` [PATCH] nvme: avoid cqe corruption when update at the same time as read Marta Rybczynska
2016-03-09 17:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-03-10 8:31 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2016-03-10 11:08 ` Marta Rybczynska
2016-03-10 14:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-03-10 15:07 ` Marta Rybczynska
2016-03-15 8:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-03-10 15:07 ` Keith Busch [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160310150745.GA23087@localhost.localdomain \
--to=keith.busch@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.