All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: do we need that smp_wmb() in __d_alloc()?
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 21:17:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160310211729.GN17997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160310203428.GM17997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 08:34:28PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:

> Speaking of barriers - why do we need one there at all?  In __d_alloc(), that
> is.  Look: callers of __d_alloc() are:
> 	* d_alloc() - cycles parent's ->d_lock, inserts into the list of
> parent's children.  Anyone observing it on that list of children will be
> holding the same parent's ->d_lock.  And anyone finding it in any other way
> will have to observe the effect of store done after the write barrier in
> spin_unlock.

... which still leaves the possibility of both stores migrating inside the
lock/unlock pair and past each other.  IOW,
	lock parent's d_lock
	lock child's d_lock
	put into hash
	store terminating NUL in ->d_name
	unlock parent's d_lock
	unlock child's d_lock
is a possible sequence of events, with RCU access on another CPU observing
the damn without seeing the NUL-terminated name ;-/

Oh, well...

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-10 21:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-08 16:05 races in ll_splice_alias() Al Viro
2016-03-08 20:44 ` Drokin, Oleg
2016-03-08 21:11   ` Al Viro
2016-03-08 23:18     ` Drokin, Oleg
2016-03-09  0:34       ` Al Viro
2016-03-09  0:53         ` Drokin, Oleg
2016-03-09  1:26           ` Al Viro
2016-03-09  5:20             ` Drokin, Oleg
2016-03-09 23:47             ` Drokin, Oleg
2016-03-10  2:20               ` races in ll_splice_alias() and elsewhere (ext4, ocfs2) Al Viro
2016-03-10  2:59                 ` Al Viro
2016-03-10 23:55                   ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-03-11  3:18                     ` Al Viro
2016-03-11 15:42                       ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-03-10  3:08                 ` Drokin, Oleg
2016-03-10  3:34                   ` Al Viro
2016-03-10  3:46                     ` Drokin, Oleg
2016-03-10  4:22                       ` Drokin, Oleg
2016-03-10  4:43                       ` Al Viro
2016-03-10  5:15                         ` Al Viro
2016-03-11  3:47                           ` Drokin, Oleg
2016-03-10  5:47                         ` Drokin, Oleg
2016-03-10 19:59                 ` Al Viro
2016-03-10 20:34                   ` do we need that smp_wmb() in __d_alloc()? Al Viro
2016-03-10 21:17                     ` Al Viro [this message]
2016-03-10 21:22                   ` races in ll_splice_alias() and elsewhere (ext4, ocfs2) Drokin, Oleg
2016-03-10 23:23                     ` Al Viro
2016-03-11  3:25                       ` Drokin, Oleg
2016-03-12 17:22                         ` Al Viro
2016-03-13 14:35                           ` Sage Weil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160310211729.GN17997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.