Re: [PATCH 3/3] livepatch/module: remove livepatch module notifier

[Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>]

On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 05:13:57PM -0500, Jessica Yu wrote:
> Remove the livepatch module notifier in favor of directly enabling and
> disabling patches to modules in the module loader. Hard-coding the
> function calls ensures that ftrace_module_enable() is run before
> klp_module_coming() during module load, and that klp_module_going() is
> run before ftrace_release_mod() during module unload. This way, ftrace
> and livepatch code is run in the correct order during the module
> load/unload sequence without dependence on the module notifier call chain.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/livepatch.h |  13 +++++
>  kernel/livepatch/core.c   | 145 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>  kernel/module.c           |  10 ++++
>  3 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/livepatch.h b/include/linux/livepatch.h
> index c056797..bd830d5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/livepatch.h
> +++ b/include/linux/livepatch.h
> @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/ftrace.h>
>  
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LIVEPATCH)
> +
>  #include <asm/livepatch.h>
>  
>  enum klp_state {
> @@ -132,4 +134,15 @@ int klp_unregister_patch(struct klp_patch *);
>  int klp_enable_patch(struct klp_patch *);
>  int klp_disable_patch(struct klp_patch *);
>  
> +/* Called from the module loader during module coming/going states */
> +int klp_module_coming(struct module *mod);
> +void klp_module_going(struct module *mod);
> +
> +#else /* !CONFIG_LIVEPATCH */
> +
> +static inline int klp_module_coming(struct module *mod) { return 0; }
> +static inline void klp_module_going(struct module *mod) { }
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_LIVEPATCH */
> +
>  #endif /* _LINUX_LIVEPATCH_H_ */
> diff --git a/kernel/livepatch/core.c b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> index bc2c85c..e902377 100644
> --- a/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> @@ -99,12 +99,12 @@ static void klp_find_object_module(struct klp_object *obj)
>  	/*
>  	 * We do not want to block removal of patched modules and therefore
>  	 * we do not take a reference here. The patches are removed by
> -	 * a going module handler instead.
> +	 * klp_module_going() instead.
>  	 */
>  	mod = find_module(obj->name);
>  	/*
> -	 * Do not mess work of the module coming and going notifiers.
> -	 * Note that the patch might still be needed before the going handler
> +	 * Do not mess work of klp_module_coming() and klp_module_going().
> +	 * Note that the patch might still be needed before klp_module_going()
>  	 * is called. Module functions can be called even in the GOING state
>  	 * until mod->exit() finishes. This is especially important for
>  	 * patches that modify semantic of the functions.
> @@ -866,103 +866,106 @@ int klp_register_patch(struct klp_patch *patch)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(klp_register_patch);
>  
> -static int klp_module_notify_coming(struct klp_patch *patch,
> -				     struct klp_object *obj)
> +int klp_module_coming(struct module *mod)
>  {
> -	struct module *pmod = patch->mod;
> -	struct module *mod = obj->mod;
>  	int ret;
> +	struct klp_patch *patch;
> +	struct klp_object *obj;
>  
> -	ret = klp_init_object_loaded(patch, obj);
> -	if (ret) {
> -		pr_warn("failed to initialize patch '%s' for module '%s' (%d)\n",
> -			pmod->name, mod->name, ret);
> -		return ret;
> -	}
> +	if (WARN_ON(mod->state != MODULE_STATE_COMING))
> +		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	if (patch->state == KLP_DISABLED)
> -		return 0;
> +	mutex_lock(&klp_mutex);
> +	/*
> +	 * Each module has to know that klp_module_coming()
> +	 * has been called. We never know what module will
> +	 * get patched by a new patch.
> +	 */
> +	mod->klp_alive = true;
>  
> -	pr_notice("applying patch '%s' to loading module '%s'\n",
> -		  pmod->name, mod->name);
> +	list_for_each_entry(patch, &klp_patches, list) {
> +		klp_for_each_object(patch, obj) {
> +			if (!klp_is_module(obj) || strcmp(obj->name, mod->name))
> +				continue;
>  
> -	ret = klp_enable_object(obj);
> -	if (ret)
> -		pr_warn("failed to apply patch '%s' to module '%s' (%d)\n",
> -			pmod->name, mod->name, ret);
> -	return ret;
> -}
> +			obj->mod = mod;
>  
> -static void klp_module_notify_going(struct klp_patch *patch,
> -				    struct klp_object *obj)
> -{
> -	struct module *pmod = patch->mod;
> -	struct module *mod = obj->mod;
> +			ret = klp_init_object_loaded(patch, obj);
> +			if (ret) {
> +				pr_warn("failed to initialize patch '%s' for module '%s' (%d)\n",
> +					patch->mod->name, obj->mod->name, ret);
> +				goto err;
> +			}
>  
> -	if (patch->state == KLP_DISABLED)
> -		goto disabled;
> +			if (patch->state == KLP_DISABLED)
> +				break;
> +
> +			pr_notice("applying patch '%s' to loading module '%s'\n",
> +				  patch->mod->name, obj->mod->name);
> +
> +			ret = klp_enable_object(obj);
> +			if (ret) {
> +				pr_warn("failed to apply patch '%s' to module '%s' (%d)\n",
> +					patch->mod->name, obj->mod->name, ret);
> +				goto err;
> +			}
> +
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
>  
> -	pr_notice("reverting patch '%s' on unloading module '%s'\n",
> -		  pmod->name, mod->name);
> +	mutex_unlock(&klp_mutex);
>  
> -	klp_disable_object(obj);
> +	return 0;
>  
> -disabled:
> +err:
> +	/*
> +	 * If a patch is unsuccessfully applied, return
> +	 * error to the module loader.
> +	 */
> +	pr_warn("patch '%s' failed for module '%s', refusing to load module '%s'\n",
> +		patch->mod->name, obj->mod->name, obj->mod->name);
>  	klp_free_object_loaded(obj);
> +	mutex_unlock(&klp_mutex);
> +
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static int klp_module_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action,
> -			     void *data)
> +void klp_module_going(struct module *mod)
>  {
> -	int ret;
> -	struct module *mod = data;
>  	struct klp_patch *patch;
>  	struct klp_object *obj;
>  
> -	if (action != MODULE_STATE_COMING && action != MODULE_STATE_GOING)
> -		return 0;
> +	if (WARN_ON(mod->state != MODULE_STATE_GOING))
> +		return;

If we're removing patch 2/3, then mod->state isn't necessarily GOING.  I
think the check can probably just be removed altogether.

With that fixed,

Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>

-- 
Josh