All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: olof@lixom.net (Olof Johansson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: mvebu: fix overlap of Crypto SRAM with PCIe memory window
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 10:11:22 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160311181122.GA12577@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bn6m3309.fsf@free-electrons.com>

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 01:56:38PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>  
>  On mar., mars 08 2016, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> 
> > When the Crypto SRAM mappings were added to the Device Tree files
> > describing the Armada XP boards in commit c466d997bb16 ("ARM: mvebu:
> > define crypto SRAM ranges for all armada-xp boards"), the fact that
> > those mappings were overlaping with the PCIe memory aperture was
> > overlooked. Due to this, we currently have for all Armada XP platforms
> > a situation that looks like this:
> >
> > Memory mapping on Armada XP boards with internal registers at
> > 0xf1000000:
> >
> >  - 0x00000000 -> 0xf0000000	3.75G 	RAM
> >  - 0xf0000000 -> 0xf1000000	16M	NOR flashes (AXP GP / AXP DB)
> >  - 0xf1000000 -> 0xf1100000	1M	internal registers
> >  - 0xf8000000 -> 0xffe0000	126M	PCIe memory aperture
> >  - 0xf8100000 -> 0xf8110000	64KB	Crypto SRAM #0	=> OVERLAPS WITH PCIE !
> >  - 0xf8110000 -> 0xf8120000	64KB	Crypto SRAM #1	=> OVERLAPS WITH PCIE !
> >  - 0xffe00000 -> 0xfff00000	1M	PCIe I/O aperture
> >  - 0xfff0000  -> 0xffffffff	1M	BootROM
> >
> > The overlap means that when PCIe devices are added, depending on their
> > memory window needs, they might or might not be mapped into the
> > physical address space. Indeed, they will not be mapped if the area
> > allocated in the PCIe memory aperture by the PCI core overlaps with
> > one of the Crypto SRAM. Typically, a Intel IGB PCIe NIC that needs 8MB
> > of PCIe memory will see its PCIe memory window allocated from
> > 0xf80000000 for 8MB, which overlaps with the Crypto SRAM windows. Due
> > to this, the PCIe window is not created, and any attempt to access the
> > PCIe window makes the kernel explode:
> >
> > [    3.302213] igb: Copyright (c) 2007-2014 Intel Corporation.
> > [    3.307841] pci 0000:00:09.0: enabling device (0140 -> 0143)
> > [    3.313539] mvebu_mbus: cannot add window '4:f8', conflicts with another window
> > [    3.320870] mvebu-pcie soc:pcie-controller: Could not create MBus window at [mem 0xf8000000-0xf87fffff]: -22
> > [    3.330811] Unhandled fault: external abort on non-linefetch (0x1008) at 0xf08c0018
> >
> > This problem does not occur on Armada 370 boards, because we use the
> > following memory mapping (for boards that have internal registers at
> > 0xf1000000):
> >
> >  - 0x00000000 -> 0xf0000000	3.75G 	RAM
> >  - 0xf0000000 -> 0xf1000000	16M	NOR flashes (AXP GP / AXP DB)
> >  - 0xf1000000 -> 0xf1100000	1M	internal registers
> >  - 0xf1100000 -> 0xf1110000	64KB	Crypto SRAM #0 => OK !
> >  - 0xf8000000 -> 0xffe0000	126M	PCIe memory
> >  - 0xffe00000 -> 0xfff00000	1M	PCIe I/O
> >  - 0xfff0000  -> 0xffffffff	1M	BootROM
> >
> > Obviously, the solution is to align the location of the Crypto SRAM
> > mappings of Armada XP to be similar with the ones on Armada 370, i.e
> > have them between the "internal registers" area and the beginning of
> > the PCIe aperture.
> >
> > However, we have a special case with the OpenBlocks AX3-4 platform,
> > which has a 128 MB NOR flash. Currently, this NOR flash is mapped from
> > 0xf0000000 to 0xf8000000. This is possible because on OpenBlocks
> > AX3-4, the internal registers are not at 0xf1000000. And this explains
> > why the Crypto SRAM mappings were not configured at the same place on
> > Armada XP.
> >
> > Hence, the solution is two-fold:
> >
> >  (1) Move the NOR flash mapping on Armada XP OpenBlocks AX3-4 from
> >      0xe8000000 to 0xf0000000. This frees the 0xf0000000 ->
> >      0xf80000000 space.
> >
> >  (2) Move the Crypto SRAM mappings on Armada XP to be similar to
> >      Armada 370 (except of course that Armada XP has two Crypto SRAM
> >      and not one).
> >
> > After this patch, the memory mapping on Armada XP boards with
> > registers at 0xf1 is:
> >
> >  - 0x00000000 -> 0xf0000000	3.75G 	RAM
> >  - 0xf0000000 -> 0xf1000000	16M	NOR flashes (AXP GP / AXP DB)
> >  - 0xf1000000 -> 0xf1100000	1M	internal registers
> >  - 0xf1100000 -> 0xf1110000	64KB	Crypto SRAM #0
> >  - 0xf1110000 -> 0xf1120000	64KB	Crypto SRAM #1
> >  - 0xf8000000 -> 0xffe0000	126M	PCIe memory
> >  - 0xffe00000 -> 0xfff00000	1M	PCIe I/O
> >  - 0xfff0000  -> 0xffffffff	1M	BootROM
> >
> > And the memory mapping for the special case of the OpenBlocks AX3-4
> > (internal registers at 0xd0000000, NOR of 128 MB):
> >
> >  - 0x00000000 -> 0xc0000000	3G 	RAM
> >  - 0xd0000000 -> 0xd1000000	1M	internal registers
> >  - 0xe800000  -> 0xf0000000	128M	NOR flash
> >  - 0xf1100000 -> 0xf1110000	64KB	Crypto SRAM #0
> >  - 0xf1110000 -> 0xf1120000	64KB	Crypto SRAM #1
> >  - 0xf8000000 -> 0xffe0000	126M	PCIe memory
> >  - 0xffe00000 -> 0xfff00000	1M	PCIe I/O
> >  - 0xfff0000  -> 0xffffffff	1M	BootROM
> >
> > Fixes: c466d997bb16 ("ARM: mvebu: define crypto SRAM ranges for all armada-xp boards")
> > Reported-by: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
> > Cc: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
> > Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
> 
> Arnd, Olof,
> 
> it would be nice having this fix applied on v4.5-rc. Could you applied
> this patch directly, or do you want pull request for it?

Applied to fixes. Are you 150% sure you don't need some bake time on this patch
to avoid surprises?


-Olof

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-11 18:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-08 15:59 [PATCH] ARM: mvebu: fix overlap of Crypto SRAM with PCIe memory window Thomas Petazzoni
2016-03-10 12:56 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2016-03-11 18:11   ` Olof Johansson [this message]
2016-03-11  6:58 ` Phil Sutter
2016-03-11  9:36 ` Boris Brezillon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160311181122.GA12577@localhost \
    --to=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.