All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akinobu.mita@gmail.com,
	jack@suse.cz, sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com,
	peter@hurleysoftware.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] printk: Factor out buffering and irq work queuing in printk_deferred
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 10:21:57 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160314012157.GA8074@swordfish> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1457692627-14076-2-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com>

Hello Byungchul,

Sorry, I'll make sure I Cc you next time. Jan Kara's updated patch set

http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=145787625506342

it's quite close to what you have done in this patch, but Jan's
patch also solves a number of more likely to happen cases.

have time to take a look?

the lock debug patch in your series is different. can we settle
down async printk first and then return to it? it's not so simple...


On (03/11/16 19:37), Byungchul Park wrote:
[..]
>  int printk_deferred(const char *fmt, ...)
>  {
>  	va_list args;
>  	int r;
>  
>  	preempt_disable();
> +
>  	va_start(args, fmt);
> -	r = vprintk_emit(0, LOGLEVEL_SCHED, NULL, 0, fmt, args);
> +	r = vprintk_deferred(fmt, args);
>  	va_end(args);
> +	printk_pending_output();
>  
> -	__this_cpu_or(printk_pending, PRINTK_PENDING_OUTPUT);
> -	irq_work_queue(this_cpu_ptr(&wake_up_klogd_work));
>  	preempt_enable();
>  
>  	return r;

vprintk_deferred() does vprintk_emit()->{spin_lock()} again? cosole_lock() is
moved out of sight, but logbug_lock is still there. wouldn't this (in the worst
case) result in endless loop after all? sorry if I'm missing something.

	-ss

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-14  1:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-11 10:37 [PATCH v6 0/2] Make printing of spin_dump() deferred to avoid a deadlock Byungchul Park
2016-03-11 10:37 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] printk: Factor out buffering and irq work queuing in printk_deferred Byungchul Park
2016-03-14  1:21   ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2016-03-14  4:45     ` Byungchul Park
2016-03-11 10:37 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] printk: Make printing of spin_dump() deferred to avoid a deadlock Byungchul Park
2016-03-14  1:37   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-03-14  2:30     ` Byungchul Park
2016-03-14  2:40       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-03-14  4:17         ` Byungchul Park
2016-03-16  2:06           ` Byungchul Park
2016-03-18  5:55 ` [PATCH] lib/spinlock_debug: Prevent a unnecessary recursive spin_dump() Byungchul Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160314012157.GA8074@swordfish \
    --to=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
    --cc=akinobu.mita@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.