All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Qipeng Zha <qipeng.zha@intel.com>, Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@intel.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] PCI: Move PCIe ports to D3hot during suspend
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 11:32:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160314093259.GD1796@lahna.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160312002039.GK4725@localhost>

On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 06:20:39PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 02:56:03PM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > Currently the PCI core does not do this automatically as it avoids changing
> > power state for bridges and PCIe ports. With recent hardware PCIe ports can
> > be moved to D3hot given that we take into account few restrictions:
> > 
> >   - Devices connected to the ports are effectively in D3cold once the root
> >     port is moved to D3hot (the config space is not accessible anymore and
> >     the link may be powered down).
> > 
> >   - The device needs to be able to transition to D3cold.
> 
> I think this is talking about "devices below the PCIe port", right?

That's right. I'll fix it in the next version.

> >   - If the device is capable of waking the system it needs to be able to
> >     do so from D3cold (PME from D3cold).
> 
> Again, "a device below the PCIe port"?

Right (will fix in the next version).

> > We assume all recent hardware (starting from 2015) is capable of doing this
> > but make it possible to add exceptions via entries in pcie_port_configs[].
> 
> Since you have no exceptions yet, I'm not sure it's worth having the
> exception infrastructure.  That infrastructure kind of obscures the
> meat of the patch, so if we really do need it right away, maybe it
> could be added in a new separate patch.

I don't think we need it right now. I'll drop it from the patch.

> > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 100 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c
> > index 6c6bb03392ea..fe3349685141 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c
> > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> >  
> >  #include "portdrv.h"
> >  #include "aer/aerdrv.h"
> > +#include "../pci.h"
> >  
> >  /*
> >   * Version Information
> > @@ -78,11 +79,105 @@ static int pcie_portdrv_restore_config(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > +enum pcie_port_type {
> > +	PCIE_PORT_DEFAULT,
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct pcie_port_config {
> > +	bool suspend_allowed;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct pcie_port_config pcie_port_configs[] = {
> > +	[PCIE_PORT_DEFAULT] = {
> > +		.suspend_allowed = true,
> > +	},
> > +};
> > +
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_PM
> > +static const struct pcie_port_config *pcie_port_get_config(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > +{
> > +	const struct pci_device_id *id = pci_match_id(pdev->driver->id_table,
> > +						      pdev);
> > +	return &pcie_port_configs[id->driver_data];
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int pcie_port_check_d3cold(struct pci_dev *pdev, void *data)
> > +{
> > +	bool *d3cold_ok = data;
> > +
> > +	if (pdev->no_d3cold || !pdev->d3cold_allowed)
> > +		*d3cold_ok = false;
> > +	if (device_may_wakeup(&pdev->dev) && !pci_pme_capable(pdev, PCI_D3cold))
> > +		*d3cold_ok = false;
> > +
> > +	return !*d3cold_ok;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool pcie_port_can_suspend(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > +{
> > +	bool d3cold_ok = true;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * When the port is put to D3hot the devices behind the port are
> > +	 * effectively in D3cold as their config space cannot be accessed
> > +	 * anymore and the link may be powered down.
> > +	 *
> > +	 * We only allow the port to go to D3hot the devices:
> 
> s/the devices/if the subordinate devices/

OK

> > +	 *  - Are allowed to go to D3cold
> > +	 *  - Can wake up from D3cold if they are wake capable
> > +	 */
> > +	pci_walk_bus(pdev->subordinate, pcie_port_check_d3cold, &d3cold_ok);
> > +	return d3cold_ok;
> 
> What happens if the PCIe port initially can be put in D3hot, but we we
> later hot-add a device that would disqualify it?
> 
> Oh, I think I see -- we walk the subordinate devices every time we
> would like to put the port in D3hot:
> 
>   pcie_port_suspend_noirq
>     pcie_port_suspend_allowed
>       dmi_get_date
>       pcie_port_can_suspend
>         pci_walk_bus
> 
> I guess that should work, but it seems clunky to do all that work,
> even though it's not really a performance path.  What if we did this:
> 
>   - add a d3hot_allowed bit in struct pci_dev
> 
>   - when enumerating a port, set d3hot_allowed if BIOS is new enough
>     (it makes me a bit nervous that we apparently default to enabling
>     D3hot on arches without DMI)
> 
>   - when enumerating devices, clear d3hot_allowed in upstream bridge
>     if necessary
> 
>   - when removing last device on a bus, re-do port config (set
>     d3hot_allowed if appropriate)

Sounds reasonable. I'll give it a try.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-14  9:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-29 12:56 [PATCH 0/6] PCI: Add support for suspending (including runtime) of PCIe ports Mika Westerberg
2016-02-29 12:56 ` [PATCH 1/6] PCI: No need to set d3cold_allowed to " Mika Westerberg
2016-03-12  0:01   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-03-14  8:56     ` Mika Westerberg
2016-02-29 12:56 ` [PATCH 2/6] PCI: Make __pci_bus_set_current_state() available to other files Mika Westerberg
2016-02-29 12:56 ` [PATCH 3/6] PCI: Move PCIe ports to D3hot during suspend Mika Westerberg
2016-03-12  0:20   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-03-14  9:32     ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2016-03-17 10:31       ` Mika Westerberg
2016-03-17 13:40         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-02-29 12:56 ` [PATCH 4/6] PCI: Add runtime PM support for PCIe ports Mika Westerberg
2016-03-12  0:30   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-03-14  9:18     ` Mika Westerberg
2016-02-29 12:56 ` [PATCH 5/6] PCI: Enable runtime PM for Intel Sunrisepoint PCIe root ports Mika Westerberg
2016-02-29 12:56 ` [PATCH 6/6] PCI: Enable runtime PM for Intel Broxton " Mika Westerberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160314093259.GD1796@lahna.fi.intel.com \
    --to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qi.zheng@intel.com \
    --cc=qipeng.zha@intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.