From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
Cathy Avery <cavery@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] block: fix bio merge checks when virt_boundary is set
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 16:03:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160315160321.GA30533@localhost.lm.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1458055076-2175-1-git-send-email-vkuznets@redhat.com>
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 04:17:56PM +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> The reason of the slowdown is the fact that bios don't get merged and we
> end up sending many short requests to the host. My investigation led me to
> the following code (__bvec_gap_to_prev()):
>
> return offset ||
> ((bprv->bv_offset + bprv->bv_len) & queue_virt_boundary(q));
>
> Here is an example: we have two bio_vec with the following content:
> bprv.bv_offset = 512
> bprv.bv_len = 512
>
> bnxt.bv_offset = 1024
> bnxt.bv_len = 512
>
> bprv.bv_page == bnxt.bv_page
> virt_boundary is set to PAGE_SIZE-1
>
> The above mentioned code will report that a gap will appear if we merge
> these two (as offset = 1024) but this doesn't look sane. On top of that,
> we have the following optimization in bio_add_pc_page():
>
> if (page == prev->bv_page &&
> offset == prev->bv_offset + prev->bv_len) {
> prev->bv_len += len;
> bio->bi_iter.bi_size += len;
> goto done;
> }
This part sounds odd. Why is a filesystem using bio_add_pc_page? Shouldn't
these go through "bio_add_page" instead? That already has an optimization
to combine bio's within the same page.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-15 16:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-15 15:17 [PATCH RFC] block: fix bio merge checks when virt_boundary is set Vitaly Kuznetsov
2016-03-15 16:03 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2016-03-16 10:17 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2016-03-16 15:40 ` Ming Lei
2016-03-16 16:26 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2016-03-16 22:38 ` Keith Busch
2016-03-17 11:20 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2016-03-17 16:39 ` Keith Busch
2016-03-18 2:59 ` Ming Lei
2016-03-30 13:07 ` Ming Lei
2016-04-20 13:48 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2016-12-15 14:03 ` Dexuan Cui
2016-12-15 14:03 ` Dexuan Cui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160315160321.GA30533@localhost.lm.intel.com \
--to=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cavery@redhat.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=sagig@mellanox.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.