From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Release power ref after updating wm
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 08:23:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160316152301.GA10492@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1458141331.4473.19.camel@intel.com>
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 05:15:31PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> Matt has a similar fix already on the list, Matt/Ville what's the plan
> with that? Could we have a stop-gap solution?
>
> --Imre
Yeah, I wrote two separate patches that would both be fixes for that
issue. One of them moved the PM reference drop like the patch below;
the other wrapped the actual watermark programming in a PM
get_if_enabled() call to make sure the reference was held throughout the
watermark programming, or skipped the watermark programming entirely if
we were already fully powered down.
Neither patch got a reviewed-by and I got wrapped up in something else
and forgot to poke anyone. I don't have a strong preference either way
on which fix is best (they should both be fine for now I think). I
think longer-term we'll eventually need the second approach above once
we allow the watermark programming to happen asynchronously via a
workqueue task.
Matt
>
> On Wed, 2016-03-16 at 17:11 +0200, Gabriel Feceoru wrote:
> > On HSW/BDW there are random dmesg-warn errors while running kms
> > tests, like:
> >
> > [90587.867077] Call Trace:
> > [90587.867085] [<ffffffff81403dae>] dump_stack+0x67/0x99
> > [90587.867094] [<ffffffff810790f1>] warn_slowpath_common+0x81/0xc0
> > [90587.867099] [<ffffffff81079177>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x47/0x50
> > [90587.867150] [<ffffffffa036e280>] hsw_write32+0x280/0x290 [i915]
> > [90587.867186] [<ffffffffa0315cc8>] _ilk_disable_lp_wm+0x98/0xd0
> > [i915]
> > [90587.867222] [<ffffffffa031b1f2>]
> > ilk_program_watermarks+0x4a2/0x940 [i915]
> > [90587.867260] [<ffffffffa031b6e0>]
> > ilk_optimize_watermarks+0x50/0x70 [i915]
> > [90587.867311] [<ffffffffa03894e2>] intel_atomic_commit+0x742/0x2170
> > [i915]
> > [90587.867319] [<ffffffff810c06b0>] ? wait_woken+0xa0/0xa0
> > [90587.867326] [<ffffffff81535062>] drm_atomic_commit+0x32/0x50
> > [90587.867333] [<ffffffff8150fd89>]
> > drm_atomic_helper_connector_dpms+0xe9/0x1a0
> > [90587.867340] [<ffffffff81529acd>]
> > drm_mode_obj_set_property_ioctl+0x21d/0x230
> > [90587.867346] [<ffffffff81529b0b>]
> > drm_mode_connector_property_set_ioctl+0x2b/0x30
> > [90587.867352] [<ffffffff8151a7a6>] drm_ioctl+0x236/0x4f0
> > [90587.867358] [<ffffffff81529ae0>] ?
> > drm_mode_obj_set_property_ioctl+0x230/0x230
> > [90587.867366] [<ffffffff811e90de>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x8e/0x680
> > [90587.867372] [<ffffffff811f4f5a>] ? __fget_light+0x6a/0x90
> > [90587.867378] [<ffffffff811e970c>] SyS_ioctl+0x3c/0x70
> > [90587.867386] [<ffffffff817cbf9b>]
> > entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x73
> >
> > Since writing the watermarks requires MMIO access, this should be
> > done before
> > releasing the power reference.
> >
> > This clears the flip-flops in kms tests on HSW/BDW.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gabriel Feceoru <gabriel.feceoru@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 6 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > index ce55f0b..b141e52 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > @@ -13631,9 +13631,6 @@ static int intel_atomic_commit(struct
> > drm_device *dev,
> > modeset_put_power_domains(dev_priv,
> > put_domains[i]);
> > }
> >
> > - if (intel_state->modeset)
> > - intel_display_power_put(dev_priv,
> > POWER_DOMAIN_MODESET);
> > -
> > /*
> > * Now that the vblank has passed, we can go ahead and
> > program the
> > * optimal watermarks on platforms that need two-step
> > watermark
> > @@ -13648,6 +13645,9 @@ static int intel_atomic_commit(struct
> > drm_device *dev,
> > dev_priv-
> > >display.optimize_watermarks(intel_cstate);
> > }
> >
> > + if (intel_state->modeset)
> > + intel_display_power_put(dev_priv,
> > POWER_DOMAIN_MODESET);
> > +
> > mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> > drm_atomic_helper_cleanup_planes(dev, state);
> > mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
--
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
IoTG Platform Enabling & Development
Intel Corporation
(916) 356-2795
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-16 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-16 15:11 [PATCH] drm/i915: Release power ref after updating wm Gabriel Feceoru
2016-03-16 15:15 ` Imre Deak
2016-03-16 15:23 ` Matt Roper [this message]
2016-03-16 17:36 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160316152301.GA10492@intel.com \
--to=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.