From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Kazuki Yamaguchi <k@rhe.jp>,
Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@axis.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] sched: leaf_cfs_rq_list use after free
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 18:04:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160316170456.GC6344@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160316165006.GL6980@mtj.duckdns.org>
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 09:50:06AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > static void cpu_cgroup_css_free(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
> > {
> > struct task_group *tg = css_tg(css);
> >
> > + /*
> > + * Relies on the RCU grace period between css_released() and this.
> > + */
> > + sched_free_group(tg);
> > }
>
> Hmmm... I don't think it'd be safe to merge the two ops. Nothing
> guarantees that the RCU callback of cpu controller is called after the
> cgroup core one and cgroup core one would do use-after-free. Just
> changing offline to released should do.
I'm confused, the code looks like:
static void cpu_cgroup_css_released(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
{
struct task_group *tg = css_tg(css);
sched_offline_group(tg);
}
static void cpu_cgroup_css_free(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
{
struct task_group *tg = css_tg(css);
/*
* Relies on the RCU grace period between css_release() and this.
*/
sched_free_group(tg);
}
css_released(): sched_offline_group() takes everything down and does
list_del_rcu() etc..
css_free(): does just a kfree() of bits, no RCU no nothing, relying
instead on the fact that there is an RCU GP between
css_released() and css_free().
This is not correct?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-16 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-12 9:42 [BUG] sched: leaf_cfs_rq_list use after free Kazuki Yamaguchi
2016-03-12 13:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-14 11:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-14 12:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-16 14:24 ` Tejun Heo
2016-03-16 14:44 ` Tejun Heo
2016-03-16 15:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-16 16:50 ` Tejun Heo
2016-03-16 17:04 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-03-16 17:49 ` Tejun Heo
2016-03-17 8:29 ` Niklas Cassel
2016-03-21 11:15 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched/cgroup: Fix/cleanup cgroup teardown/init tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-28 18:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-28 18:51 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2016-04-28 21:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-02 3:06 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-03-04 10:41 [BUG] sched: leaf_cfs_rq_list use after free Niklas Cassel
2016-03-10 12:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-11 17:02 ` Niklas Cassel
2016-03-11 17:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-11 18:20 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160316170456.GC6344@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=k@rhe.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=niklas.cassel@axis.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.