Re: [PATCH 0/4] cyclictest: improve running under trace-cmd

[Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>]

On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 23:37:21 +0100 (CET)
John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> On Wed, 16 Mar 2016, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 11:29:13 -0500
> > Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > This is just a repost of my RFC posting with no changes.
> > > I have tested it a bit more and I think it's good
> > > for inclusion.
> > 
> > ping?
> > 
> > > 
> > > Original intro:
> > > 
> > > In short, this series allows you to run cyclictest under
> > > trace-cmd and still get trace marks when the latency
> > > specified with -b is execeded. More details in patch 4/4.
> > > 
> > > This series is RFC because I'm not completely sure this
> > > is the right thing to do. I'm wondering if we shouldn't
> > > ditch all tracing support from cyclictest...
> > > 
> > > Luiz Capitulino (4):
> > >   cyclictest: tracing(): check for notrace
> > >   cyclictest: move debugfs init code to its own function
> > >   cyclictest: move tracemark_fd handling to its own function
> > >   cyclictest: add --tracemark option
> > > 
> > >  src/cyclictest/cyclictest.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > >  1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > 
> > --
> 
> I'll have a closer look tomorrow, but these look okay.

There's a small conflict due to the older repo I was using. I'll
rebase it, re-test and re-post.