From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-qk0-x22f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22f]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1agVri-0003B1-E7 for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 11:13:20 +0000 Received: by mail-qk0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id o6so33463016qkc.2 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 04:12:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 07:12:48 -0400 From: Bob Copeland Subject: Re: [RFCv2 0/3] mac80211: implement fq codel Message-ID: <20160317111248.GC1238@localhost> References: <1458123478-1795-1-git-send-email-michal.kazior@tieto.com> <20160316185531.GA1771@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Michal Kazior Cc: Network Development , linux-wireless , Dave Taht , "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" , Jasmine Strong , "codel@lists.bufferbloat.net" , make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 09:55:03AM +0100, Michal Kazior wrote: > If you consider Wi-Fi is half-duplex and latency in the entire stack > (for processing ICMP and UDP_RR) is greater than 11e contention window > timings you can get your BE flow responses with extra delay (since > other queues might have responses ready quicker). Got it, that makes sense. Thanks for the explanation! -- Bob Copeland %% http://bobcopeland.com/ _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-qk0-f171.google.com ([209.85.220.171]:36419 "EHLO mail-qk0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030338AbcCQLM7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Mar 2016 07:12:59 -0400 Received: by mail-qk0-f171.google.com with SMTP id s68so33438471qkh.3 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 04:12:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 07:12:48 -0400 From: Bob Copeland To: Michal Kazior Cc: Jasmine Strong , Dave Taht , Network Development , linux-wireless , "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" , "codel@lists.bufferbloat.net" , make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [RFCv2 0/3] mac80211: implement fq codel Message-ID: <20160317111248.GC1238@localhost> (sfid-20160317_121308_705385_3604CF93) References: <1458123478-1795-1-git-send-email-michal.kazior@tieto.com> <20160316185531.GA1771@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 09:55:03AM +0100, Michal Kazior wrote: > If you consider Wi-Fi is half-duplex and latency in the entire stack > (for processing ICMP and UDP_RR) is greater than 11e contention window > timings you can get your BE flow responses with extra delay (since > other queues might have responses ready quicker). Got it, that makes sense. Thanks for the explanation! -- Bob Copeland %% http://bobcopeland.com/