From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 13:28:26 +0100
From: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>
Message-ID: <20160318122826.GA3345@hermes.click-hack.org>
References: <56EBDBCE.3030800@sigmatek.at>
 <20160318111030.GE6555@hermes.click-hack.org>
 <56EBF155.6010006@sigmatek.at>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <56EBF155.6010006@sigmatek.at>
Subject: Re: [Xenomai] ipipe bug in gpio/irq for mx6
List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project <xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://xenomai.org/mailman/options/xenomai>,
 <mailto:xenomai-request@xenomai.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai/>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-request@xenomai.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai>,
 <mailto:xenomai-request@xenomai.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Johann Obermayr <johann.obermayr@sigmatek.at>
Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 01:15:17PM +0100, Johann Obermayr wrote:
> Am 18.03.2016 um 12:10 schrieb Gilles Chanteperdrix:
> > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:43:26AM +0100, Johann Obermayr wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> in the the git branch ipipe-3.0-imx6q
> > This I-pipe patch is really old now. Any chance to use a current
> > version of Xenomai?
> Not now. but we have started to change to 3.10.x with newer xenomai
> >> in the file arch/arm/plat-mxc/gpio.c
> >>
> >> there is follow function.
> >>
> >> void __ipipe_mach_enable_irqdesc(struct ipipe_domain *ipd, unsigned irq)
> >> {
> >>       struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> >>       struct irq_data *idata = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
> >>       struct irq_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip(idata);
> >>
> >>       if (chip == &gpio_irq_chip) {
> >>           /* It is a gpio. */
> >>           u32 gpio = irq_to_gpio(irq);
> >>           struct mxc_gpio_port *port = &mxc_gpio_ports[gpio / 32];
> >>
> >>           if (ipd != &ipipe_root) {
> >>               port->nonroot_gpios |= (1 << (gpio % 32));
> >>               if (port->nonroot_gpios == (1 << (gpio % 32))) {
> >>                   __ipipe_irqbits[(port->irq / 32)]
> >>                       &= ~(1 << (port->irq % 32));
> >>                   set_irq_prio(port->irq, 1);
> >>               }
> >>           }
> >>       } else
> >>           set_irq_prio(irq, ipd != &ipipe_root);
> >> }
> >>
> >> But there is missing  set_irq_prio for the port->irq_high.
> >> to add
> >>                   if (port->irq_high > 0)
> >>                       set_irq_prio(port->irq_high, 1);
> >> is not my problem.
> >>
> >> my problem is, that i don't known if  __ipipe_irqbits is handled
> >> correct.
> > Well, if you want to set port->irq_high, you have to clear the
> > corresponding bit in __ipipe_irqbits, as is done for port->irq.
> >
> Thank you Gilles.
> 
> i've also take a part from newer version.
> void __ipipe_mach_enable_irqdesc(struct ipipe_domain *ipd, unsigned irq)
> {
>      struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
>      struct irq_data *idata = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
>      struct irq_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip(idata);
> 
>      if (chip == &gpio_irq_chip) {
>          /* It is a gpio. */
>          u32 gpio = irq_to_gpio(irq);
>          struct mxc_gpio_port *port = &mxc_gpio_ports[gpio / 32];
> 
>          if (ipd == &ipipe_root) {
>              port->nonroot_gpios &= ~(1 << (gpio % 32));
>              if (port->nonroot_gpios == 0) {
>                  __ipipe_irqbits[(port->irq / 32)] &= ~(1 << (port->irq 
> % 32));
>                  __ipipe_irqbits[(port->irq_high / 32)] &= ~(1 << 
> (port->irq_high % 32));
>                  set_irq_prio(port->irq, 0);
>                  if (port->irq_high > 0)
>                      set_irq_prio(port->irq_high, 0);
>              }
>          } else {
>              port->nonroot_gpios |= (1 << (gpio % 32));
>              if (port->nonroot_gpios == (1 << (gpio % 32))) {
>                  __ipipe_irqbits[(port->irq / 32)] &= ~(1 << (port->irq 
> % 32));
>                  __ipipe_irqbits[(port->irq_high / 32)] &= ~(1 << 
> (port->irq_high % 32));
>                  set_irq_prio(port->irq, 1);
>                  if (port->irq_high > 0)
>                      set_irq_prio(port->irq_high, 1);
>              }
>          }
>      } else
>          set_irq_prio(irq, ipd != &ipipe_root);
> }
> 
> is this correct to clear the the bit in __ipipe_irqbits also for ipd == 
> ipipe_root ?

It is useless, __ipipe_mach_enable_irqdesc for root irqs is called
only once at boot time, when the bits are already cleared.

-- 
					    Gilles.
https://click-hack.org