All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Patrick Donnelly <pdonnel3@nd.edu>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question regarding ptrace work for LInux v3.1
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 20:35:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160321193524.GA9494@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALJO4zEH6tLLQQ33qFJ8STTLrRPcbvPqOWKUT8=Qu3-S82Ecng@mail.gmail.com>

On 03/21, Patrick Donnelly wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Yes, exactly, you need to see the initial SIGSTOP or another event which
> > can be reported before it.
>
> Assuming a SIGSTOP is being silenced, is there anything we can do to
> forcibly start tracing syscalls? (For kernels without PTRACE_SEIZE)

No. Only PTRACE_SYSCALL can set TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE.

> >         case SIGSTOP:
> >         /* Black magic to get threads working on old Linux kernels... */
> >
> >         if(p->nsyscalls == 0) { /* stop before we begin running the process */
> >                 debug(D_DEBUG, "suppressing bootstrap SIGSTOP for %d",pid);
> >                 signum = 0; /* suppress delivery */
> >                 kill(p->pid,SIGCONT);
> >         }
> >         break;
> >
> > doesn't look right. Note that kill(pid,SIGCONT) affects the whole thread-
> > group. So if this kill() races with another thread doing clone() you can
> > hit the problem you described.
>
> You're right, that should be tkill! I will give that a try and report
> back if that solved the issue for our collaborators...

Ah, sorry, I should have mentioned this...

No, tkill() won't help. See prepare_signal(), SIGCONT always removes
the SIG_KERNEL_STOP_MASK signals from all threads, not matter if it was
sent by tkill() or kill().

Perhaps you should just remove this kill(SIGCONT) ?

tracer_continue(signr => 0) should equally suppress the delivery. To
clarify this won't be right too, but without PTRACE_SEIZE you simply
can't write the code which handles the stop/cont/etc events correctly
anyway...

> >> > But unless you use PTRACE_SEIZE the same can happen on v3.1 so it seems
> >> > there is something else.
> >>
> >> Okay, it might be that PTRACE_SEIZE fixes it.
> >
> > Yes, but iiuc you do not see this problem on v3.1 even with PTRACE_ATTACH?
>
> I have not tested on >v3.1 with PTRACE_ATTACH.

OK, thanks. So perhaps this is not v3.0-specific.

Oleg.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-21 19:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CALJO4zGaZBzCEHsD4oan=nhpQasmxWiN535RLM+2bXngcabQmA@mail.gmail.com>
2016-03-21 17:47 ` Question regarding ptrace work for LInux v3.1 Oleg Nesterov
2016-03-21 18:28   ` Patrick Donnelly
2016-03-21 19:07     ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-03-21 19:24       ` Patrick Donnelly
2016-03-21 19:35         ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2016-03-23 14:12           ` Patrick Donnelly

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160321193524.GA9494@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pdonnel3@nd.edu \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.