From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Reject non-canonical rotations
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 12:43:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160322104322.GG4329@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1458642941-8092-1-git-send-email-matthew.auld@intel.com>
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:35:41AM +0000, Matthew Auld wrote:
> Reject any rotation value which incorrectly represents multiple rotations.
>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c
> index 7de7721..6cb564f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c
> @@ -156,6 +156,11 @@ static int intel_plane_atomic_check(struct drm_plane *plane,
> intel_state->clip.y2 =
> crtc_state->base.enable ? crtc_state->pipe_src_h : 0;
>
> + if (!is_power_of_2(state->rotation)) {
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Multiple rotations are not supported!\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
Such a check should be done in the core. Are we not doing it there?
> +
> if (state->fb && intel_rotation_90_or_270(state->rotation)) {
> if (!(state->fb->modifier[0] == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED ||
> state->fb->modifier[0] == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED)) {
> --
> 2.4.3
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-22 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-22 10:35 [PATCH] drm/i915: Reject non-canonical rotations Matthew Auld
2016-03-22 10:43 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2016-03-22 10:48 ` Matthew Auld
2016-03-22 10:59 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-03-22 11:36 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-03-22 14:14 ` Matthew Auld
2016-03-23 8:58 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-03-23 13:30 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2016-03-23 16:18 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-03-23 16:24 ` Matthew Auld
2016-03-23 16:30 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-03-22 12:32 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160322104322.GG4329@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.