From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.25.208.211 with SMTP id h202csp2259731lfg; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 22:20:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.165.205 with SMTP id l196mr1025033qhl.58.1458710418538; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 22:20:18 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org. [2001:4830:134:3::11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f68si760261qge.89.2016.03.22.22.20.18 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 22 Mar 2016 22:20:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org designates 2001:4830:134:3::11 as permitted sender) client-ip=2001:4830:134:3::11; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org designates 2001:4830:134:3::11 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:40990 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aibDO-0007xr-1p for alex.bennee@linaro.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 01:20:18 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37418) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aibDL-0007wO-Bq for qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 01:20:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aibDI-0006MK-6K for qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 01:20:15 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50217) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aibDI-0006M6-0S; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 01:20:12 -0400 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3ABBE83F44; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 05:20:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pxdev.xzpeter.org (dhcp-14-238.nay.redhat.com [10.66.14.238]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u2N5K0T8006598 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 23 Mar 2016 01:20:04 -0400 Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 13:19:59 +0800 From: Peter Xu To: Markus Armbruster Message-ID: <20160323051959.GH28183@pxdev.xzpeter.org> References: <1458271654-23706-1-git-send-email-peterx@redhat.com> <87zitqoaqe.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87zitqoaqe.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.24 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, drjones@redhat.com, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, abologna@redhat.com, qemu-arm@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/5] ARM: add query-gic-capabilities SMP command X-BeenThere: qemu-arm@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org X-TUID: asTsRucHZeEL On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 03:20:25PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote: > We discussed the need for a yet another ad hoc query command. Can you > please summarize the discussion and its conclusion? Explaining *why* a > feature is needed is always a good idea. Cover letter and commit > messages are good places for it. Sure. I will mention that in commit message of patch 1 in the next spin. Thanks. -- peterx From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37434) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aibDM-0007x8-Tc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 01:20:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aibDM-0006NF-5b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 01:20:16 -0400 Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 13:19:59 +0800 From: Peter Xu Message-ID: <20160323051959.GH28183@pxdev.xzpeter.org> References: <1458271654-23706-1-git-send-email-peterx@redhat.com> <87zitqoaqe.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87zitqoaqe.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/5] ARM: add query-gic-capabilities SMP command List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: wei@redhat.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org, drjones@redhat.com, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, abologna@redhat.com, qemu-arm@nongnu.org On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 03:20:25PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote: > We discussed the need for a yet another ad hoc query command. Can you > please summarize the discussion and its conclusion? Explaining *why* a > feature is needed is always a good idea. Cover letter and commit > messages are good places for it. Sure. I will mention that in commit message of patch 1 in the next spin. Thanks. -- peterx