diff for duplicates of <20160323173945.GC5544@linux.intel.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 6797a15..18f3ddb 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -72,7 +72,3 @@ since ext2 doesn't do huge page mappings.
 So, buffer_unwritten() and buffer_new() both always return false, right?
 
 Yea...we really need to clean up our buffer flag handling. :)
-_______________________________________________
-Linux-nvdimm mailing list
-Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
-https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index b543909..d032eb3 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -4,10 +4,13 @@
  "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 04/10] dax: Fix data corruption for written and mmapped files\0"
  "Date\0Wed, 23 Mar 2016 11:39:45 -0600\0"
  "To\0Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>\0"
- "Cc\0linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org"
-  NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
+ "Cc\0linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org"
   Wilcox
- "\0"
+  Matthew R <matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>
+  Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
+  Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
+  linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
+ " NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 02:22:49PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:\n"
@@ -83,10 +86,6 @@
  "\n"
  "So, buffer_unwritten() and buffer_new() both always return false, right?\n"
  "\n"
- "Yea...we really need to clean up our buffer flag handling. :)\n"
- "_______________________________________________\n"
- "Linux-nvdimm mailing list\n"
- "Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org\n"
- https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
+ Yea...we really need to clean up our buffer flag handling. :)
 
-26cffd3ace865d746d36e1f4049f8f647fba569140cc9d64381bef7b374f0b19
+3ab8c7dcbb2d47f6320d5d937eddbff73b4db2b647babcc6f7911454ca55ca6f
