From: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario_limonciello@dell.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@coreos.com>,
Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add fwupdate and Mok GUID's to the EFI variable immutable whitelist
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 21:07:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160323210745.GJ11676@codeblueprint.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56F20129.9020202@dell.com>
On Tue, 22 Mar, at 09:36:25PM, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>
> Actually, I think this patch should be discarded unless there is a
> desire to make the kernel work with older userspace tools.
>
> I later realized that efivar 0.22 will actually handle working with
> immutable variables properly. This means that mokutil 0.2 won't work
> with this kernel commit, but mokutil 0.3 which uses efivar
> (https://github.com/lcp/mokutil/commit/7b49e834284659527c9f7cf554f223748c00564b)
> should work properly.
>
> fwupdate works properly in most instances except for an install time
> cleanup script that removes stale variables. This is fixed with a
> trivial change:
> https://github.com/rhinstaller/fwupdate/pull/50/commits/535d3a0f9c096d452cc7e2b5be79cf964e2d6d5b
Indeed. Given that the kernel patch works around such a serious
problem, I'm inclined to encourage distributions to upgrade mokutil
and fwupdate.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-23 21:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-22 21:37 [PATCH] Add fwupdate and Mok GUID's to the EFI variable immutable whitelist Mario Limonciello
2016-03-23 2:36 ` Mario Limonciello
2016-03-23 21:07 ` Matt Fleming [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160323210745.GJ11676@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--to=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario_limonciello@dell.com \
--cc=mjg59@coreos.com \
--cc=pjones@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.