From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com,
daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] arm64: cpuidle: make arm_cpuidle_suspend() more efficient
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 11:15:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160324111507.GB9323@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1458796130-6109-1-git-send-email-jszhang@marvell.com>
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 01:08:48PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> This series is to improve the arm_cpuidle_suspend() a bit by removing/moving
> out checks from this hot path.
>
> Jisheng Zhang (2):
> arm64: cpuidle: remove cpu_ops check from arm_cpuidle_suspend()
> arm64: cpuidle: make arm_cpuidle_suspend() a bit more efficient
>
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c | 9 ++-------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
These look fine to me, but do you have any rough numbers showing what
sort of improvement we get from this change?
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-24 11:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-24 5:08 [PATCH 0/2] arm64: cpuidle: make arm_cpuidle_suspend() more efficient Jisheng Zhang
2016-03-24 5:08 ` Jisheng Zhang
2016-03-24 5:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: cpuidle: remove cpu_ops check from arm_cpuidle_suspend() Jisheng Zhang
2016-03-24 5:08 ` Jisheng Zhang
2016-03-24 5:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: cpuidle: make arm_cpuidle_suspend() a bit more efficient Jisheng Zhang
2016-03-24 5:08 ` Jisheng Zhang
2016-03-24 11:15 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2016-03-24 13:18 ` [PATCH 0/2] arm64: cpuidle: make arm_cpuidle_suspend() " Jisheng Zhang
2016-03-24 13:18 ` Jisheng Zhang
2016-03-24 16:44 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-03-24 16:44 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-03-25 2:40 ` Jisheng Zhang
2016-03-25 2:40 ` Jisheng Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160324111507.GB9323@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=jszhang@marvell.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.