All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Peter Pan <peterpansjtu@gmail.com>
Cc: computersforpeace@gmail.com, dwmw2@infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	karlzhang@micron.com, beanhuo@micron.com,
	xuejiancheng@huawei.com, Peter Pan <peterpandong@micron.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] mtd: nand_bbt: introduce independent nand BBT
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 09:50:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160325095015.341a11eb@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1457923684-13505-1-git-send-email-peterpandong@micron.com>

On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 02:47:53 +0000
Peter Pan <peterpansjtu@gmail.com> wrote:

> Sorry for send the v3 out late. I went through a busy time in the past
> two month.
> 
> Currently nand_bbt.c is tied with struct nand_chip, and it makes other
> NAND family chips hard to use nand_bbt.c. Maybe it's the reason why
> onenand has own bbt(onenand_bbt.c).
> 
> Separate struct nand_chip from BBT code can make current BBT shareable.
> We create struct nand_bbt to take place of nand_chip in nand_bbt.c.
> Struct nand_bbt contains all the information BBT needed from outside and
> it should be embedded into NAND family chip struct (such as struct nand_chip).
> 
> Below is mtd folder structure we want:
> 	drivers/mtd/nand/<all-nand-core-code>
> 	drivers/mtd/nand/raw/<raw-nand-controller-drivers>
> 	drivers/mtd/nand/spi/<spi-nand-code>
> 	drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/<onenand-code>
> 	drivers/mtd/nand/chips/<manufacturer-spcific-code>

Hm, we should have a chips directory under each interface type, because
vendor specific handling is dependent on the NAND interface.
Otherwise, yes, that's the idea.


-- 
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-03-25  8:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-14  2:47 [PATCH 00/11] mtd: nand_bbt: introduce independent nand BBT Peter Pan
2016-03-14  2:47 ` [PATCH 01/11] mtd: nand_bbt: new header for nand family BBT Peter Pan
2016-03-14  2:47 ` [PATCH 02/11] mtd: nand_bbt: introduce BBT related data structure Peter Pan
2016-03-25  8:35   ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-28  8:09     ` Peter Pan
2016-03-29  8:16       ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-18  6:22     ` Peter Pan
2016-04-18  7:44       ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-19  0:40         ` Peter Pan
2016-04-19  7:34           ` Boris Brezillon
2016-05-04  1:36             ` Peter Pan
2016-05-04 20:33               ` Boris Brezillon
2016-05-17  1:03                 ` Peter Pan
2016-06-17  2:38                   ` Peter Pan
2016-06-21 13:27                     ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-14  2:47 ` [PATCH 03/11] mtd: nand_bbt: add new API definitions Peter Pan
2016-03-14  3:47   ` kbuild test robot
2016-03-25  8:49   ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-28  7:56     ` Peter Pan
2016-03-14  2:47 ` [PATCH 04/11] mtd: nand_bbt: add nand_bbt_markbad_factory() interface Peter Pan
2016-03-14  2:47 ` [PATCH 05/11] mtd: nand: use new BBT API instead of old ones Peter Pan
2016-03-25  8:51   ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-28  8:12     ` Peter Pan
2016-03-29  8:07       ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-14  2:47 ` [PATCH 06/11] mtd: nand_bbt: use struct nand_bbt_ops in BBT Peter Pan
2016-03-14  2:48 ` [PATCH 07/11] mtd: nand: make nand_erase_nand() static Peter Pan
2016-03-14  2:48 ` [PATCH 08/11] mtd: nand_bbt: remove struct nand_chip from nand_bbt.c Peter Pan
2016-03-14  2:48 ` [PATCH 09/11] mtd: nand_bbt: remove old API definitions Peter Pan
2016-03-14  2:48 ` [PATCH 10/11] mtd: nand_bbt: remove NAND_BBT_DYNAMICSTRUCT macro Peter Pan
2016-03-14  2:48 ` [PATCH 11/11] mtd: nand: remove nand_chip.bbt Peter Pan
2016-03-14  2:57 ` [PATCH 00/11] mtd: nand_bbt: introduce independent nand BBT Peter Pan
2016-03-16 12:57   ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-23 20:57 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2016-03-28  8:20   ` Peter Pan
2016-03-29  8:02     ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-25  8:50 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2016-03-28  7:56   ` Peter Pan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160325095015.341a11eb@bbrezillon \
    --to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
    --cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=karlzhang@micron.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=peterpandong@micron.com \
    --cc=peterpansjtu@gmail.com \
    --cc=xuejiancheng@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.