From: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: "Elliott Cable" <me@ell.io>,
"Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy" <pclouds@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: `git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree` and $GIT_WORK_TREE
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 23:00:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160329220003.GG1578@serenity.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160329212143.GA30116@sigill.intra.peff.net>
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 05:21:43PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 09:52:08PM +0100, John Keeping wrote:
>
> > > Yeah, I think this is a bug. Presumably what is happening is that we are
> > > too eager to "cd $GIT_WORK_TREE" inside git-rev-parse, and by the time
> > > we ask "are we in a work tree", the answer has become yes. But the
> > > caller really wants to know "am _I_ inside the work tree".
> >
> > I don't think that's what's happening. Try:
> >
> > $ cd .git/
> > $ GIT_WORK_TREE=.. git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree
> > true
> >
> > so I think it's that we refuse to assume that the directory above a Git
> > directory is a working tree (something similar happens when the
> > "core.worktree" config variable is set). I'm not convinced that's
> > unreasonable.
>
> Yeah, you're right, but I'm not sure how your example shows that, (isn't
> it basically the same as Elliott's original, except using a relative
> path?). A more compelling counter-example to my hypothesis is:
>
> $ cd .git
> $ GIT_WORK_TREE=/tmp git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree
> false
>
> So it is not that we chdir too early, but just that we blindly check "is
> $(pwd) inside $GIT_WORK_TREE". And it does not create a problem for the
> normal discovered-path cases, because either:
>
> - we discovered .git by walking up the directory tree, which means we
> must be in a work-tree
>
> - we discovered that we are inside a .git directory, and therefore
> take it to be bare (and thus there is no work tree, and we cannot be
> inside it). This is what happens in Elliott's original example that
> behaves differently than the $GIT_WORK_TREE case.
>
> I'd be tempted to say that "inside the work tree" is further clarified
> to "not inside the $GIT_DIR".
Yes, I think that's reasonable. But...
> > However, the case above also gives:
> >
> > $ GIT_WORK_TREE=.. git rev-parse --is-inside-git-dir
> > false
> > $ test $(pwd) = $(GIT_WORK_TREE=.. git rev-parse --git-dir); echo $?
> > 0
> >
> > so even though $PWD *is* the Git directory, we're not in the Git
> > directory! Setting GIT_DIR=$(pwd) makes no different to that.
>
> We seem to get that wrong. I'm also not sure if it would make sense if
> you explicitly set the two to be equal, like:
>
> # checking in your own refs?
> GIT_WORK_TREE=$(pwd) GIT_DIR=$(pwd) git add refs packed-refs
>
> So the current behavior may just be weird-but-true.
This case definitely feels wrong:
$ GIT_WORK_TREE=$(cd ..; pwd) GIT_DIR=$(pwd) git rev-parse --is-inside-git-dir
false
Shouldn't that be the same as if GIT_WORK_TREE and GIT_DIR aren't set?
(It's also potentially surprising since "git rev-parse --git-dir" does
give the right answer in this case.)
If GIT_WORK_TREE points somewhere unrelated then it is correct:
$ GIT_WORK_TREE=/tmp GIT_DIR=$(pwd) git rev-parse --is-inside-git-dir
true
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-29 22:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-29 11:42 `git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree` and $GIT_WORK_TREE Elliott Cable
2016-03-29 11:53 ` Elliott Cable
2016-03-29 12:33 ` John Keeping
2016-03-29 15:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-03-29 19:41 ` Jeff King
2016-03-29 19:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-03-29 20:26 ` Jeff King
2016-03-29 20:34 ` Jeff King
2016-03-29 20:52 ` John Keeping
2016-03-29 21:21 ` Jeff King
2016-03-29 22:00 ` John Keeping [this message]
2016-03-29 22:14 ` John Keeping
2016-03-29 22:16 ` Jeff King
2016-03-29 22:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-03-30 0:53 ` Duy Nguyen
2016-04-01 0:49 ` Elliott Cable
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160329220003.GG1578@serenity.lan \
--to=john@keeping.me.uk \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@ell.io \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.