From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53467) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1alBCA-0000Lr-Cj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 04:09:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1alBC7-00007H-1Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 04:09:42 -0400 Received: from barbershop.grep.be ([89.106.240.122]:41177) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1alBC6-00006E-Ri for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 04:09:38 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:09:26 +0200 From: Wouter Verhelst Message-ID: <20160330080926.GA3517@grep.be> References: <1459173555-4890-1-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> <1459292460-6875-1-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1459292460-6875-1-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Nbd] [PATCH v2 0/3] NBD Structured Read List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi Eric, On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 05:00:57PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > I wrote this in parallel with Alex's strawman proposals, so I > may have picked up on some of his ideas, while diverging in > other places. > > Changes since v1: rebase, resend some pre-req patches, switch > from global/client flag negotiation over to option negotiation, > document a flags/type scheme in all structured replies, use > ONLY structured replies in response to a structured read, make > the server stream fully context-free (thanks to the type scheme), > go into more details about error reporting by using two different > structured errors (multiple errors each with offset, or single > error with no offset). > > Eric Blake (2): > doc: Mention proper use of handle > doc: Propose Structured Read extension > > Pavel Borzenkov (1): > NBD proto: add "Command flags" section Thanks. 1 and 2 applied, 3 not yet (until resolution of discussion) (not yet pushed yet, will do so later) -- < ron> I mean, the main *practical* problem with C++, is there's like a dozen people in the world who think they really understand all of its rules, and pretty much all of them are just lying to themselves too. -- #debian-devel, OFTC, 2016-02-12