diff for duplicates of <20160330132708.GC32738@redhat.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 71bc0f2..f6a4f91 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -43,11 +43,11 @@ On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 02:05:30PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
 > > > >     on the memory consumption of the kdump system. In general this is not
 > > > >     dependent on the memory size of the production system.
 > > > >  
-> > > > -   On arm, use "crashkernel=Y@X". Note that the start address of the kernel
+> > > > -   On arm, use "crashkernel=Y at X". Note that the start address of the kernel
 > > > > -   will be aligned to 128MiB (0x08000000), so if the start address is not then
 > > > > -   any space below the alignment point may be overwritten by the dump-capture kernel,
 > > > > -   which means it is possible that the vmcore is not that precise as expected.
-> > > > +   On arm, the use of "crashkernel=Y@X" is no longer necessary; the
+> > > > +   On arm, the use of "crashkernel=Y at X" is no longer necessary; the
 > > > > +   kernel will automatically locate the crash kernel image within the
 > > > > +   first 512MB of RAM if X is not given.
 > > > >  
@@ -87,8 +87,3 @@ if ARM can support higher, it would be good to allow that.
 
 Thanks
 Vivek
-
-_______________________________________________
-kexec mailing list
-kexec@lists.infradead.org
-http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index cc03986..9cc5317 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -2,17 +2,10 @@
  "ref\020160330014638.GA6993@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com\0"
  "ref\020160330123922.GA11351@dhcppc0.redhat.com\0"
  "ref\020160330130530.GH19428@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk\0"
- "From\0Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] ARM: kexec: fix crashkernel= handling\0"
+ "From\0vgoyal@redhat.com (Vivek Goyal)\0"
+ "Subject\0[PATCH] ARM: kexec: fix crashkernel= handling\0"
  "Date\0Wed, 30 Mar 2016 09:27:08 -0400\0"
- "To\0Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>\0"
- "Cc\0Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>"
-  linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
-  Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
-  kexec@lists.infradead.org
-  Haren Myneni <hbabu@us.ibm.com>
-  Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
- " linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
+ "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 02:05:30PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:\n"
@@ -60,11 +53,11 @@
  "> > > >     on the memory consumption of the kdump system. In general this is not\n"
  "> > > >     dependent on the memory size of the production system.\n"
  "> > > >  \n"
- "> > > > -   On arm, use \"crashkernel=Y@X\". Note that the start address of the kernel\n"
+ "> > > > -   On arm, use \"crashkernel=Y at X\". Note that the start address of the kernel\n"
  "> > > > -   will be aligned to 128MiB (0x08000000), so if the start address is not then\n"
  "> > > > -   any space below the alignment point may be overwritten by the dump-capture kernel,\n"
  "> > > > -   which means it is possible that the vmcore is not that precise as expected.\n"
- "> > > > +   On arm, the use of \"crashkernel=Y@X\" is no longer necessary; the\n"
+ "> > > > +   On arm, the use of \"crashkernel=Y at X\" is no longer necessary; the\n"
  "> > > > +   kernel will automatically locate the crash kernel image within the\n"
  "> > > > +   first 512MB of RAM if X is not given.\n"
  "> > > >  \n"
@@ -103,11 +96,6 @@
  "if ARM can support higher, it would be good to allow that.\n"
  "\n"
  "Thanks\n"
- "Vivek\n"
- "\n"
- "_______________________________________________\n"
- "kexec mailing list\n"
- "kexec@lists.infradead.org\n"
- http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
+ Vivek
 
-631fcd86916ba87802ac7b62306e03e15366b940d04028a41e5dbfc77fab1e1f
+c37d3208b9bf3350b1dff2c2800dbe84cbc5b23d5091096f8b281d4b8611350f
