From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
perf group <linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: perf trace report with time consumed
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 10:01:40 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160401130140.GA7115@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11979280.sfXiZ5YTfG@agathebauer>
Em Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 12:34:44AM +0200, Milian Wolff escreveu:
> Nice, so the frame point unwinding seems to work already. But I'm a user-space
> person and none of my tools have that. So let's try dwarf:
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> perf trace -e nanosleep --call-graph dwarf path/to/ex_sleep
> perf: Segmentation fault
> Obtained 10 stack frames.
> perf(sighandler_dump_stack+0x4f) [0x5637fdcfc85f]
> /usr/lib/libc.so.6(+0x3332f) [0x7fe888b2132f]
> /usr/lib/libc.so.6(__vsnprintf_chk+0x6b) [0x7fe888be38db]
> perf(+0xb3f93) [0x5637fdc56f93]
> perf(+0xb8fec) [0x5637fdc5bfec]
> perf(cmd_trace+0x1c14) [0x5637fdc5e5c4]
> perf(+0xe6bae) [0x5637fdc89bae]
> perf(main+0x6e3) [0x5637fdc23a83]
> /usr/lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xef) [0x7fe888b0e70f]
> perf(_start+0x28) [0x5637fdc23bc8]
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Ouch :( Valgrind gives me:
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ==8053== Syscall param msync(start) points to uninitialised byte(s)
> ==8053== at 0x528A700: __msync_nocancel (in /usr/lib/libpthread-2.23.so)
> ==8053== by 0x4E396D6: validate_mem (Ginit.c:137)
> ==8053== by 0x4E396D6: access_mem (Ginit.c:171)
> ==8053== by 0x4E3F79D: dwarf_get (libunwind_i.h:168)
> ==8053== by 0x4E3F79D: apply_reg_state (Gparser.c:819)
> ==8053== by 0x4E3EE72: _ULx86_64_dwarf_find_save_locs (Gparser.c:907)
> ==8053== by 0x4E4126A: _ULx86_64_dwarf_step (Gstep.c:34)
> ==8053== by 0x4E3A873: _ULx86_64_step (Gstep.c:71)
> ==8053== by 0x4E3B9CF: trace_init_addr (Gtrace.c:248)
> ==8053== by 0x4E3B9CF: trace_lookup (Gtrace.c:330)
> ==8053== by 0x4E3B9CF: _ULx86_64_tdep_trace (Gtrace.c:447)
> ==8053== by 0x4E38C8F: backtrace (backtrace.c:69)
> ==8053== by 0x26185F: dump_stack (util.c:338)
> ==8053== by 0x26185F: sighandler_dump_stack (util.c:356)
> ==8053== by 0x69B232F: ??? (in /usr/lib/libc-2.23.so)
> ==8053== by 0x6A748DA: __vsnprintf_chk (in /usr/lib/libc-2.23.so)
> ==8053== by 0x1BBF93: vsnprintf (stdio2.h:77)
> ==8053== by 0x1BBF93: scnprintf (kernel.h:91)
> ==8053== Address 0xffeffa000 is on thread 1's stack
> ==8053== in frame #7, created by backtrace (backtrace.c:59)
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Any idea what I'm missing in the setup routine? It works fine for `perf trace
> record --call-graph dwarf`.
Jiri?
I have to investigate this, I cooked up a patch almost the same as
yours, only using the top callchain OPT_ stuff because it also sets
those symbol_conf globals, but ended up having trouble with libunwind
:-\
BTW: Those callchain related globals have to go, finally, because I want
to be able to enable callchain collection/reporting per event, i.e.
output that shows callchains for some 'perf probe' events while not for
all syscalls except for futex(), etc.
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-01 13:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-29 20:39 perf trace report with time consumed Milian Wolff
2016-03-30 14:53 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-03-30 21:24 ` Milian Wolff
2016-03-30 21:58 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-03-31 22:34 ` Milian Wolff
2016-04-01 13:01 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2016-04-03 16:30 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-04-03 18:46 ` Milian Wolff
2016-04-04 6:14 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-04-04 21:17 ` Milian Wolff
2016-04-05 8:35 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-04-06 15:46 ` [PATCH] perf tools: Add dedicated unwind addr_space member into thread struct Jiri Olsa
2016-04-06 21:15 ` Milian Wolff
2016-04-08 12:58 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-06 21:16 ` perf trace report with time consumed Milian Wolff
2016-04-08 13:01 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160401130140.GA7115@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=milian.wolff@kdab.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.