From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>,
Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/hvm: separate ioreq server code from generic hvm code
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 15:04:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160401140447.GF27636@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56FE98AE02000078000E2161@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 07:50:06AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 01.04.16 at 09:54, <paul.durrant@citrix.com> wrote:
> > The code in hvm/hvm.c related to handling I/O emulation using the ioreq
> > server framework is large and mostly self-contained.
> >
> > This patch separates the ioreq server code into a new hvm/ioreq.c source
> > module and accompanying asm-x86/hvm/ioreq.h header file. There is no
> > intended functional change, only code movement.
>
> Considering how badly the diff gets represented, I can only trust
> you on that.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>
>
> Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
>
> But as indicated on IRC already, Wei will need to give his okay,
> as this is something that didn't get posted prior to the feature
> freeze date.
>
Acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Not a new feature by my definition, so I don't object to this. This
needs to be applied as soon as possible though so that OSSTest can catch
any issue.
Wei.
> Jan
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-01 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-01 7:54 [PATCH v2] x86/hvm: separate ioreq server code from generic hvm code Paul Durrant
2016-04-01 13:50 ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-01 14:04 ` Wei Liu [this message]
2016-04-01 14:35 ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-01 14:53 ` Paul Durrant
2016-04-04 16:07 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-04-06 13:20 ` Wei Liu
2016-04-06 13:22 ` Wei Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160401140447.GF27636@citrix.com \
--to=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=paul.durrant@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.