From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Deepak M <m.deepak@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] drm/i915/dsi: clean up vlv gpio table and definitions
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 20:07:31 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160404170731.GL4329@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c625e9421c128ce3fa9a20be4518cc71f73e4f54.1458299160.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 01:11:11PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Define and store the pad base offset in the array, and reference the
> pconf0 and padval registers through macros. Add VLV prefixes to
> macros. Use spec nomenclature for pconf0 and padval.
>
> v2: Address Ville's review comments, squash another patch here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c | 87 ++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c
> index af1a47b5224f..b04d88e6127b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c
> @@ -58,50 +58,41 @@ static inline struct vbt_panel *to_vbt_panel(struct drm_panel *panel)
>
> #define NS_KHZ_RATIO 1000000
>
> -#define GPI0_NC_0_HV_DDI0_HPD 0x4130
> -#define GPIO_NC_0_HV_DDI0_PAD 0x4138
> -#define GPIO_NC_1_HV_DDI0_DDC_SDA 0x4120
> -#define GPIO_NC_1_HV_DDI0_DDC_SDA_PAD 0x4128
> -#define GPIO_NC_2_HV_DDI0_DDC_SCL 0x4110
> -#define GPIO_NC_2_HV_DDI0_DDC_SCL_PAD 0x4118
> -#define GPIO_NC_3_PANEL0_VDDEN 0x4140
> -#define GPIO_NC_3_PANEL0_VDDEN_PAD 0x4148
> -#define GPIO_NC_4_PANEL0_BLKEN 0x4150
> -#define GPIO_NC_4_PANEL0_BLKEN_PAD 0x4158
> -#define GPIO_NC_5_PANEL0_BLKCTL 0x4160
> -#define GPIO_NC_5_PANEL0_BLKCTL_PAD 0x4168
> -#define GPIO_NC_6_PCONF0 0x4180
> -#define GPIO_NC_6_PAD 0x4188
> -#define GPIO_NC_7_PCONF0 0x4190
> -#define GPIO_NC_7_PAD 0x4198
> -#define GPIO_NC_8_PCONF0 0x4170
> -#define GPIO_NC_8_PAD 0x4178
> -#define GPIO_NC_9_PCONF0 0x4100
> -#define GPIO_NC_9_PAD 0x4108
> -#define GPIO_NC_10_PCONF0 0x40E0
> -#define GPIO_NC_10_PAD 0x40E8
> -#define GPIO_NC_11_PCONF0 0x40F0
> -#define GPIO_NC_11_PAD 0x40F8
> +/* base offsets for gpio pads */
> +#define VLV_GPIO_NC_0_HV_DDI0_HPD 0x4130
> +#define VLV_GPIO_NC_1_HV_DDI0_DDC_SDA 0x4120
> +#define VLV_GPIO_NC_2_HV_DDI0_DDC_SCL 0x4110
> +#define VLV_GPIO_NC_3_PANEL0_VDDEN 0x4140
> +#define VLV_GPIO_NC_4_PANEL0_BLKEN 0x4150
> +#define VLV_GPIO_NC_5_PANEL0_BLKCTL 0x4160
> +#define VLV_GPIO_NC_6_PCONF0 0x4180
> +#define VLV_GPIO_NC_7_PCONF0 0x4190
> +#define VLV_GPIO_NC_8_PCONF0 0x4170
> +#define VLV_GPIO_NC_9_PCONF0 0x4100
> +#define VLV_GPIO_NC_10_PCONF0 0x40E0
> +#define VLV_GPIO_NC_11_PCONF0 0x40F0
Still looks wonky with those unnamed ones using _PCONF0, and some of the
named ones not matching the spec 100%.
Digging through the spec I came up with this list:
#define VLV_GPIO_NC_0_HV_DDI0_HPD 0x4130
#define VLV_GPIO_NC_1_HV_DDI0_DDC_SDA 0x4120
#define VLV_GPIO_NC_2_HV_DDI0_DDC_SCL 0x4110
#define VLV_GPIO_NC_3_PANEL0_VDDEN 0x4140
#define VLV_GPIO_NC_4_PANEL0_BKLTEN 0x4150
#define VLV_GPIO_NC_5_PANEL0_BKLTCTL 0x4160
#define VLV_GPIO_NC_6_HV_DDI1_HPD 0x4180
#define VLV_GPIO_NC_7_HV_DDI1_DDC_SDA 0x4190
#define VLV_GPIO_NC_8_HV_DDI1_DDC_SCL 0x4170
#define VLV_GPIO_NC_9_PANEL1_VDDEN 0x4100
#define VLV_GPIO_NC_10_PANEL1_BKLTEN 0x40E0
#define VLV_GPIO_NC_11_PANEL1_BKLTCTL 0x40F0
> +
> +#define VLV_GPIO_PCONF0(base_offset) (base_offset)
> +#define VLV_GPIO_PAD_VAL(base_offset) ((base_offset) + 8)
>
> struct gpio_table {
> - u16 function_reg;
> - u16 pad_reg;
> - u8 init;
> + u16 base_offset;
> + bool init;
> };
>
> -static struct gpio_table gtable[] = {
> - { GPI0_NC_0_HV_DDI0_HPD, GPIO_NC_0_HV_DDI0_PAD, 0 },
> - { GPIO_NC_1_HV_DDI0_DDC_SDA, GPIO_NC_1_HV_DDI0_DDC_SDA_PAD, 0 },
> - { GPIO_NC_2_HV_DDI0_DDC_SCL, GPIO_NC_2_HV_DDI0_DDC_SCL_PAD, 0 },
> - { GPIO_NC_3_PANEL0_VDDEN, GPIO_NC_3_PANEL0_VDDEN_PAD, 0 },
> - { GPIO_NC_4_PANEL0_BLKEN, GPIO_NC_4_PANEL0_BLKEN_PAD, 0 },
> - { GPIO_NC_5_PANEL0_BLKCTL, GPIO_NC_5_PANEL0_BLKCTL_PAD, 0 },
> - { GPIO_NC_6_PCONF0, GPIO_NC_6_PAD, 0 },
> - { GPIO_NC_7_PCONF0, GPIO_NC_7_PAD, 0 },
> - { GPIO_NC_8_PCONF0, GPIO_NC_8_PAD, 0 },
> - { GPIO_NC_9_PCONF0, GPIO_NC_9_PAD, 0 },
> - { GPIO_NC_10_PCONF0, GPIO_NC_10_PAD, 0},
> - { GPIO_NC_11_PCONF0, GPIO_NC_11_PAD, 0}
> +static struct gpio_table vlv_gpio_table[] = {
> + { VLV_GPIO_NC_0_HV_DDI0_HPD },
> + { VLV_GPIO_NC_1_HV_DDI0_DDC_SDA },
> + { VLV_GPIO_NC_2_HV_DDI0_DDC_SCL },
> + { VLV_GPIO_NC_3_PANEL0_VDDEN },
> + { VLV_GPIO_NC_4_PANEL0_BLKEN },
> + { VLV_GPIO_NC_5_PANEL0_BLKCTL },
> + { VLV_GPIO_NC_6_PCONF0 },
> + { VLV_GPIO_NC_7_PCONF0 },
> + { VLV_GPIO_NC_8_PCONF0 },
> + { VLV_GPIO_NC_9_PCONF0 },
> + { VLV_GPIO_NC_10_PCONF0 },
> + { VLV_GPIO_NC_11_PCONF0 },
> };
>
> static inline enum port intel_dsi_seq_port_to_port(u8 port)
> @@ -199,7 +190,7 @@ static const u8 *mipi_exec_delay(struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi, const u8 *data)
> static const u8 *mipi_exec_gpio(struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi, const u8 *data)
> {
> u8 gpio_source, gpio_index, action, port;
> - u16 function, pad;
> + u16 pconf0, padval;
> u32 val;
> struct drm_device *dev = intel_dsi->base.base.dev;
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> @@ -218,7 +209,7 @@ static const u8 *mipi_exec_gpio(struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi, const u8 *data)
> /* pull up/down */
> action = *data++ & 1;
>
> - if (gpio_index >= ARRAY_SIZE(gtable)) {
> + if (gpio_index >= ARRAY_SIZE(vlv_gpio_table)) {
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("unknown gpio index %u\n", gpio_index);
> goto out;
> }
> @@ -242,21 +233,21 @@ static const u8 *mipi_exec_gpio(struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi, const u8 *data)
> }
> }
>
> - function = gtable[gpio_index].function_reg;
> - pad = gtable[gpio_index].pad_reg;
> + pconf0 = VLV_GPIO_PCONF0(vlv_gpio_table[gpio_index].base_offset);
> + padval = VLV_GPIO_PAD_VAL(vlv_gpio_table[gpio_index].base_offset);
>
> mutex_lock(&dev_priv->sb_lock);
> - if (!gtable[gpio_index].init) {
> + if (!vlv_gpio_table[gpio_index].init) {
> /* program the function */
> /* FIXME: remove constant below */
> - vlv_iosf_sb_write(dev_priv, port, function, 0x2000CC00);
> - gtable[gpio_index].init = 1;
> + vlv_iosf_sb_write(dev_priv, port, pconf0, 0x2000CC00);
> + vlv_gpio_table[gpio_index].init = true;
> }
>
> val = 0x4 | action;
>
> /* pull up/down */
> - vlv_iosf_sb_write(dev_priv, port, pad, val);
> + vlv_iosf_sb_write(dev_priv, port, padval, val);
> mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->sb_lock);
>
> out:
> --
> 2.1.4
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-04 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-18 11:11 [PATCH v2 0/9] drm/i915/dsi: improved gpio element support for vlv/chv/bxt Jani Nikula
2016-03-18 11:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] drm/i915/dsi: refer to gpio index instead of gpio to avoid confusion Jani Nikula
2016-03-24 11:57 ` Mika Kahola
2016-04-01 11:53 ` Jani Nikula
2016-03-18 11:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] drm/i915/dsi: add support for DSI sequence block v2 gpio element Jani Nikula
2016-04-04 16:19 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-04-05 7:33 ` Jani Nikula
2016-03-18 11:11 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] drm/i915/dsi: clean up vlv gpio table and definitions Jani Nikula
2016-04-04 17:07 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2016-03-18 11:11 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] drm/i915/dsi: add gpio indexes to the gpio table Jani Nikula
2016-04-04 17:37 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-03-18 11:11 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] drm/i915/dsi: abstract VLV gpio element execution to a separate function Jani Nikula
2016-03-18 11:11 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] drm/i915/dsi: add support for sequence block v3 gpio for VLV Jani Nikula
2016-03-18 11:11 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] drm/i915/chv: add more IOSF port definitions Jani Nikula
2016-04-04 17:43 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-04-05 7:34 ` Jani Nikula
2016-03-18 11:11 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] drm/i915/dsi: add support for gpio elements on CHV Jani Nikula
2016-04-04 18:11 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-03-18 11:11 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] drm/i915/bxt: add bxt dsi gpio element support Jani Nikula
2016-03-23 10:55 ` Mika Kahola
2016-03-23 11:19 ` Jani Nikula
2016-04-04 17:46 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-03-21 8:52 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for drm/i915/dsi: improved gpio element support for vlv/chv/bxt Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160404170731.GL4329@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=m.deepak@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.