From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Rini Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 09:43:11 -0400 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] mx6slevk: imximage.cfg: update to fix tINIT3 and tIH-CA violations In-Reply-To: <20160405085326.GA30800@linux-7smt.suse> References: <1459547691-7462-1-git-send-email-trini@konsulko.com> <1459547691-7462-3-git-send-email-trini@konsulko.com> <57015156.7000902@denx.de> <20160403180605.GL23166@bill-the-cat> <20160405085326.GA30800@linux-7smt.suse> Message-ID: <20160405134311.GD23166@bill-the-cat> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 04:53:28PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote: > Hi Tom, > > I know this already merged to i.mx tree. I still have a question for the > tIH-CA violation. It's not in mainline 'tho so it can always come out :) > In my side, the value is ok. clk is 400MHz. > (0x30 * 256.0) * (1000000000000.0/400000000.0) = 468.75ps. > And according to spec, to 800M date rate, the minimum tIH value is 290ps. > > So I wonder how in your side it is tIH-CA violation. The board we measured this on is based on the mx6slevk and this particular part of the board (layout, etc) is unchanged. Micron put the board under analysis and measured these violations (along with that we don't issue a reset before configuring CS1, I still might try and push that change up for the EVK at least, not armadillo tho). -- Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: